|
Trials conducted in 1998 determined that tank mixtures of Sonalan with registered herbicides continue to provide effective weed control and high tuber yields. Evaluations of sulfentrazone demonstrated that it did not injure Russet Burbank, Shepody, and Umatilla potato varieties and that sulfentrazone treatments provided exceptional control of redroot pigweed, common lambsquarters, and hairy nightshade. A tolerance trial demonstrated that BAS 656 07 H was safe on Shepody potatoes at the standard rate. Various combinations of registered herbicides and combinations of BAS 656 07 H with Sencor and Matrix were shown to provide effective weed control, which increased potato yields.
Weed control in potatoes is critical to maximize yield and tuber quality. While effective weed control is important, herbicide injury can reduce potato yield and quality. Rotational crop restrictions and potato varieties that are sensitive to Sencor and Lexone limit the herbicide products available for weed control in potatoes. New herbicides may provide effective weed control in potatoes without injury to the crop. Trials were established at the Malheur Experiment Station to evaluate new and registered herbicides for weed control and potato tolerance.
Three trials were conducted at the Malheur Experiment Station, Ontario, OR to evaluate new herbicides for weed control efficacy and crop tolerance in potatoes. Potatoes were planted April 23 and 27 in a silt loam soil with a pH 7.6 and 2.4 percent O.M. Seed pieces were planted in 36-in wide rows every 9 in. Preemergence herbicides were applied May 7, and postemergence applications of rimsulfuron were made June 6. Preemergence treatments were incorporated with overhead irrigation immediately after they were applied. Treatments were applied with a CO2-pressurized backpack sprayer delivering 20 gpa at 30 psi. Plots were irrigated with sprinklers according to crop requirements throughout the season.
Variety response and Weed Control with Sonalan and Sulfentrazone
For this trial, three potato varieties (Russet Burbank, Shepody, Umatilla) were planted in adjacent rows. Plots were 12-ft wide by 30-ft long and consisted of one row of each variety with border rows of Russet Burbank on each side. The experiment was a split-plot design with herbicide treatments as the whole plot and varieties as the subplots. Treatments were replicated four times. Each plot was evaluated for weed control and all varieties (center 3 rows) were harvested and used to calculate potato yields.
Evaluation of Preemergence Herbicides for Weed Control in Shepody Potatoes
In this trial, only Shepody potatoes were planted in plots 4-rows wide and 30-ft long. Treatments were replicated three times. The center two rows of each plot were harvested and graded to determine yields.
Tolerance of Shepody Potatoes to BAS 656 07 H
This trial was conducted to evaluate BAS 656 07 H for crop injury at normal field-use rates and at twice the normal field-use rate, and to compare it to other standard herbicides applied at twice their labeled-use rates. BAS 656 07 H is an active isomer of the herbicide Frontier (dimethenamid), and a package has been submitted to EPA for its registration on potatoes. Plots were 4-rows wide and 30-ft long. Treatments were replicated four times, and the center two rows of each plot were harvested and graded to determine yields. Plots were maintained weed-free by hand weeding.
The Malheur Experiment Station was hit by a severe hail storm on July 4 that removed a lot of the potato foliage, damaged stems, and exposed the potato hills. The month following the hail storm, air temperatures were extremely high. The combination of the hail and heat caused a large percentage of potato tubers to be small in size or misshapen. Opening the crop canopy back up also allowed additional weeds to germinate and grow. Both potato yields and weed control were affected by these environmental occurrences.
Variety response and Weed Control with Sonalan and Sulfentrazone
In this study, control of redroot pigweed and common lambsquarters on June 22 was nearly complete with the exception of Eptam applied alone (Table 1). Eptam alone provided little broadleaf control. Also at the June evaluation, Sonalan, Eptam, and Sencor alone provided among the least control of hairy nightshade and barnyardgrass. All other treatments provided 88 percent or greater control of hairy nightshade and barnyardgrass.
In September, Sonalan and Sonalan plus Eptam provided less redroot pigweed control than most other treatments. Eptam alone continued to provide the least control of any of the broadleaf weeds. Hairy nightshade control was poor for the majority of the treatments, with Matrix providing greater control than Sonalan, Eptam, and Sencor alone. Applications of sulfentrazone alone or in combinations provided complete control of redroot pigweed, common lambsquarters, and hairy nightshade. Sulfentrazone applied alone was weak on barnyardgrass but control was improved with the addition of Sencor. Combining sulfentrazone with herbicides with grass activity could provide a very effective weed control program.
The hail storm and extreme heat affected potato yield and quality and resulted in variable yield data. Because of variability, yield data is presented as treatment averages within Russet Burbank (Table 2), Shepody (Table 3), and Umatilla (Table 4) varieties. Total yields and marketable potato yields in all three varieties were among the lowest with Sonalan, Eptam, and Sencor applied alone. Matrix alone and tank mixture treatments produced among the highest potato yields in all three varieties. Sulfentrazone alone also produced among the highest total and marketable yields in Shepody and Umatilla varieties but produced less total marketable tubers in Russet Burbank than Matrix applied alone. The percentage of number one tubers for the Shepody variety was the highest in plots with the poorest weed control, while the percentage of number one tubers in the Umatilla variety was lowest in plots with poor weed control. Reduced yields in some tuber sizes with sulfentrazone treatments may have been due to barnyardgrass competition, but sulfentrazone needs to be evaluated in weed-free conditions to ensure yield reductions are not associated with its use.
Evaluation of Preemergence Herbicides for Weed Control in Shepody Potatoes
Weed control with preemergence herbicides in general was good because of the high rainfall in May. Redroot pigweed control was greater than 95 percent for all treatments on June 20 (Table 5). By September 21, control of redroot pigweed was still nearly complete with all treatments with the exception of Prowl applied alone. Control of common lambsquarters was among the lowest for Dual II Magnum on June 6, while Matrix, Eptam plus Matrix, Dual II Magnum, and Dual were among the poorest on September 21. Nightshade evaluations were variable with few clear separations among the treatments. The addition of BAS 656 07 H to Sencor or Matrix significantly improved control of hairy nightshade on both evaluation dates. Prowl alone provided less control of barnyardgrass than all other treatments on September 21. All herbicide treatments increased potato yields in comparison to the untreated check for most tuber sizes with the exception of 4-6 oz tubers (Table 6).
Tolerance of Shepody Potatoes to BAS 656 07 H
Potato injury was evident June 5 in plots treated with twice the labeled rate of Frontier and two times the standard rate of BAS 656 07 H as compared to the untreated plots (Table 7). Dual applied at twice the labeled rate also caused some stunting early in the season. Injury was primarily stunting and disappeared as the crop developed. The standard rate of BAS 656 07 H and Prowl applied at twice the field rate did not injure potatoes. Large fluctuations in potato yields were not significant because of the high variability. However at the 10 percent significance level, Prowl applied at twice the labeled rate produced higher total yield and total marketable yields than all other treatments except for BAS 656 07 H applied at the standard rate (0.64 lb ai/acre). All treatments produced potato yields equal to or greater than the hand-weeded control.
Table 1. Weed control on June 22 and September 21 with Sonalan and sulfentrazone combinations, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 1998.| Weed control | ||||||||||
| Redroot pigweed |
Common lambsquarters | Barnyardgrass |
Hairy nightshade | |||||||
Treatment |
Rate | Timing | 6-22 | 9-21 | 6-22 | 9-21 | 6-22 | 9-21 | 6-22 | 9-21 |
| lb ai/acre | ------------------------------------------------%---------------------------------------------- | |||||||||
Sonalan |
0.94 | PRE | 92 | 86 | 96 | 94 | 72 | 84 | 24 | 16 |
Eptam |
3.0 | PRE | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 69 | 75 | 13 | 10 |
Matrix |
0.016 | PRE | 98 | 99 | 98 | 84 | 93 | 90 | 85 | 56 |
Sencor |
0.25 | PRE | 96 | 90 | 98 | 98 | 70 | 73 | 63 | 21 |
Sonalan + Eptam |
0.94 + 3.0 | PRE | 95 | 84 | 98 | 93 | 97 | 91 | 71 | 41 |
Sonalan + Eptam + Matrix |
0.94 + 3.0 + 0.016 | PRE + POST | 98 | 99 | 96 | 93 | 98 | 94 | 92 | 65 |
Sonalan + Matrix |
0.94 + 0.016 | PRE | 98 | 100 | 98 | 93 | 98 | 88 | 85 | 48 |
Eptam + Sencor |
3.0 + 0.25 | PRE | 98 | 100 | 98 | 100 | 90 | 75 | 81 | 44 |
Sencor + Matrix |
0.25 + 0.016 | PRE | 98 | 99 | 98 | 100 | 95 | 90 | 85 | 70 |
Sulfentrazone |
0.25 | PRE | 98 | 100 | 98 | 100 | 92 | 71 | 98 | 100 |
Sulfentrazone |
0.31 | PRE | 98 | 100 | 98 | 100 | 88 | 68 | 98 | 100 |
Sulfentrazone + Sencor |
0.25 + 0.25 | PRE | 98 | 100 | 98 | 100 | 97 | 91 | 98 | 100 |
Sulfentrazone + Matrix |
0.25 + 0.016 | PRE | 98 | 100 | 98 | 100 | 95 | 85 | 98 | 100 |
Untreated |
- | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
LSD (0.05) |
6 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 12 | 15 | 15 | 29 | ||
Table 2. Russet Burbank tuber yield and grade in response to preemergence herbicide treatments, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 1998.
| US number one | Total no.2 |
Total marketable |
Total yield | |||||||
Treatment |
Rate | Timing | 4-6 oz | 6-12 oz | > 12 oz | Total | % | |||
| lb ai/acre | ---------------------cwt/acre------------------ | % | -------------cwt/acre------------- | |||||||
Sonalan |
0.94 | PRE | 113 | 81 | 2 | 196 | 51 | 64 | 260 | 388 |
Eptam |
3.0 | PRE | 86 | 46 | 1 | 134 | 45 | 35 | 169 | 304 |
Matrix |
0.016 | PRE | 91 | 99 | 12 | 202 | 41 | 175 | 377 | 492 |
Sencor |
0.25 | PRE | 103 | 87 | 2 | 192 | 48 | 71 | 263 | 401 |
Sonalan + Eptam |
0.94 + 3.0 | PRE | 100 | 128 | 10 | 238 | 52 | 113 | 350 | 465 |
Sonalan + Eptam + Matrix |
0.94 + 3.0 + 0.016 | PRE + POST | 94 | 130 | 12 | 236 | 47 | 154 | 390 | 504 |
Sonalan + Matrix |
0.94 + 0.016 | PRE | 96 | 88 | 12 | 196 | 41 | 164 | 360 | 479 |
Eptam + Sencor |
3.0 + 0.25 | PRE | 102 | 102 | 12 | 215 | 46 | 137 | 353 | 479 |
Sencor + Matrix |
0.25 + 0.016 | PRE | 106 | 99 | 13 | 218 | 46 | 130 | 348 | 479 |
Sulfentrazone |
0.25 | PRE | 64 | 68 | 5 | 137 | 31 | 171 | 309 | 452 |
Sulfentrazone |
0.31 | PRE | 87 | 80 | 6 | 173 | 40 | 143 | 316 | 440 |
Sulfentrazone + Sencor |
0.25 + 0.25 | PRE | 76 | 73 | 13 | 161 | 33 | 212 | 373 | 486 |
Sulfentrazone + Matrix |
0.25 + 0.016 | PRE | 72 | 76 | 2 | 150 | 32 | 194 | 344 | 477 |
Untreated |
- | - | 73 | 42 | 1 | 116 | 44 | 20 | 136 | 264 |
LSD (0.05) |
21 | 33 | NS | 42 | 9 | 48 | 48 | 58 | ||
Table 3. Shepody tuber yield and grade in response to preemergence herbicide treatments, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 1998.
| US number one | Total no.2 |
Total marketable |
Total yield | |||||||
Treatment |
Rate | Timing | 4-6 oz | 6-12 oz | > 12 oz | Total | % | |||
| lb ai/acre | ---------------------cwt/acre----------------- | % | -------------cwt/acre------------- | |||||||
Sonalan |
0.94 | PRE | 67 | 154 | 24 | 244 | 68 | 53 | 298 | 359 |
Eptam |
3.0 | PRE | 73 | 112 | 12 | 197 | 74 | 17 | 213 | 268 |
Matrix |
0.016 | PRE | 81 | 126 | 21 | 228 | 50 | 162 | 390 | 454 |
Sencor |
0.25 | PRE | 67 | 123 | 17 | 207 | 62 | 82 | 289 | 340 |
Sonalan + Eptam |
0.94 + 3.0 | PRE | 77 | 121 | 14 | 212 | 53 | 130 | 342 | 404 |
Sonalan + Eptam + Matrix |
0.94 + 3.0 + 0.016 | PRE + POST | 60 | 161 | 17 | 238 | 53 | 143 | 381 | 447 |
Sonalan + Matrix |
0.94 + 0.016 | PRE | 67 | 130 | 15 | 211 | 50 | 140 | 351 | 422 |
Eptam + Sencor |
3.0 + 0.25 | PRE | 65 | 154 | 27 | 246 | 58 | 121 | 367 | 428 |
Sencor + Matrix |
0.25 + 0.016 | PRE | 62 | 125 | 27 | 214 | 47 | 173 | 387 | 456 |
Sulfentrazone |
0.25 | PRE | 63 | 110 | 25 | 198 | 50 | 144 | 342 | 395 |
Sulfentrazone |
0.31 | PRE | 77 | 101 | 13 | 191 | 49 | 143 | 334 | 397 |
Sulfentrazone + Sencor |
0.25 + 0.25 | PRE | 82 | 126 | 22 | 230 | 53 | 134 | 363 | 437 |
Sulfentrazone + Matrix |
0.25 + 0.016 | PRE | 51 | 124 | 29 | 204 | 47 | 163 | 367 | 434 |
Untreated |
- | - | 68 | 70 | 6 | 144 | 66 | 22 | 166 | 225 |
LSD (0.05) |
NS | 37 | NS | 47 | 11 | 50 | 55 | 62 | ||
Table 4. Umatilla tuber yield and grade in response to preemergence herbicide treatments, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 1998.
| US number one | Total no.2 |
Total marketable |
Total yield | |||||||
Treatment |
Rate | Timing | 4-6 oz | 6-12 oz | > 12 oz | Total | % | |||
| lb ai/acre | ---------------------cwt/acre------------------ | % | -------------cwt/acre------------- | |||||||
Sonalan |
0.94 | PRE | 128 | 69 | 1 | 199 | 58 | 16 | 215 | 340 |
Eptam |
3.0 | PRE | 84 | 31 | 2 | 117 | 48 | 9 | 126 | 245 |
Matrix |
0.016 | PRE | 147 | 154 | 11 | 312 | 66 | 53 | 365 | 474 |
Sencor |
0.25 | PRE | 128 | 95 | 8 | 232 | 64 | 21 | 253 | 362 |
Sonalan + Eptam |
0.94 + 3.0 | PRE | 150 | 128 | 4 | 283 | 65 | 29 | 311 | 432 |
Sonalan + Eptam + matrix |
0.94 + 3.0 + 0.016 | PRE + POST | 128 | 164 | 14 | 306 | 64 | 71 | 377 | 479 |
Sonalan + Matrix |
0.94 + 0.016 | PRE | 141 | 101 | 17 | 259 | 55 | 89 | 348 | 473 |
Eptam + Sencor |
3.0 + 0.25 | PRE | 132 | 123 | 4 | 259 | 61 | 47 | 306 | 424 |
Sencor + Matrix |
0.25 + 0.016 | PRE | 141 | 154 | 8 | 303 | 61 | 53 | 355 | 494 |
Sulfentrazone |
0.25 | PRE | 140 | 128 | 6 | 274 | 61 | 50 | 324 | 447 |
Sulfentrazone |
0.31 | PRE | 147 | 94 | 5 | 246 | 57 | 56 | 302 | 429 |
Sulfentrazone + Sencor |
0.25 + 0.25 | PRE | 130 | 136 | 6 | 273 | 58 | 87 | 360 | 469 |
Sulfentrazone + Matrix |
0.25 + 0.016 | PRE | 130 | 95 | 3 | 227 | 51 | 79 | 306 | 446 |
Untreated |
- | - | 61 | 22 | 0 | 83 | 37 | 2 | 85 | 213 |
LSD (0.05) |
38 | 40 | NS | 57 | 10 | 41 | 55 | 55 | ||
Table 5. Weed control with Prowl, Dual, and BAS 656 07 H, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 1998.
| Weed control | ||||||||||
| Redroot pigweed |
Common lambsquarters | Barnyardgrass |
Hairy nightshade | |||||||
Treatment |
Rate | Timing | 6-20 | 9-21 | 6-20 | 9-21 | 6-20 | 9-21 | 6-20 | 9-21 |
| lb ai/acre | -----------------------------------------------%----------------------------------------------- | |||||||||
Frontier + Sencor |
1.17 + 0.5 | PRE | 98 | 100 | 98 | 99 | 98 | 99 | 95 | 87 |
BAS 656 07 H + Sencor |
0.64 + 0.5 | PRE | 98 | 99 | 98 | 98 | 98 | 100 | 98 | 97 |
BAS 656 07 H + Matrix |
0.016 | PRE | 98 | 99 | 98 | 99 | 98 | 100 | 97 | 93 |
Eptam + Sencor |
3.0 + 0.5 | PRE | 98 | 97 | 98 | 100 | 98 | 100 | 92 | 90 |
Prowl + Sencor |
1.0 + 0.5 | PRE | 98 | 100 | 98 | 100 | 97 | 100 | 93 | 89 |
Eptam + Matrix |
3.0 + 0.016 | PRE | 98 | 100 | 95 | 78 | 98 | 100 | 83 | 67 |
Matrix |
0.016 | PRE | 98 | 100 | 93 | 75 | 98 | 98 | 78 | 58 |
Sencor |
0.5 | PRE | 98 | 100 | 98 | 100 | 98 | 98 | 79 | 62 |
Prowl + Matrix |
1.0 + 0.016 | PRE | 98 | 100 | 98 | 100 | 98 | 100 | 96 | 83 |
Prowl + Eptam |
1.0 + 3.0 | PRE | 98 | 97 | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 | 96 | 93 |
Prowl + Eptam + Sencor |
1.0 + 3.0 + 0.5 | PRE | 98 | 100 | 98 | 100 | 98 | 100 | 92 | 94 |
Prowl + Matrix |
1.0 + 0.016 |
PRE + POST | 98 | 100 | 98 | 100 | 98 | 100 | 98 | 96 |
Prowl |
1.0 | PRE | 95 | 88 | 98 | 97 | 94 | 92 | 96 | 81 |
Dual Magnum |
1.9 | PRE | 98 | 100 | 90 | 86 | 98 | 100 | 95 | 85 |
Dual II Magnum |
1.9 | PRE | 98 | 98 | 73 | 83 | 98 | 100 | 75 | 60 |
Dual |
2.0 | PRE | 98 | 97 | 85 | 80 | 89 | 100 | 84 | 67 |
BAS 65607 + Matrix |
0.64 + 0.016 |
PRE + POST | 98 | 100 | 89 | 87 | 98 | 100 | 90 | 83 |
Untreated |
- | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
LSD (0.05) |
2 | 4 | 13 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 15 | 24 | ||
Table 6. Tuber yield and quality with Prowl, Dual, and BAS 656 07 H, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 1998.
| US number one | Total no.2 |
Total marketable |
Total yield | |||||||
Treatment |
Rate | Timing | 4-6 oz | 6-12 oz | > 12 oz | Total | % | |||
| lb ai/acre | ---------------------cwt/acre------------------ | % | -------------cwt/acre------------- | |||||||
Frontier + Sencor |
1.17 + 0.5 | PRE | 62 | 134 | 41 | 237 | 49 | 190 | 426 | 487 |
BAS 656 07 H + Sencor |
0.64 + 0.5 | PRE | 57 | 143 | 40 | 240 | 54 | 142 | 382 | 444 |
BAS 656 07 H + Matrix |
0.016 | PRE | 70 | 161 | 43 | 274 | 56 | 156 | 430 | 489 |
Eptam + Sencor |
3.0 + 0.5 | PRE | 56 | 164 | 39 | 259 | 56 | 141 | 401 | 462 |
Prowl + Sencor |
1.0 + 0.5 | PRE | 60 | 158 | 45 | 263 | 56 | 156 | 418 | 471 |
Eptam + Matrix |
3.0 + 0.016 | PRE | 61 | 136 | 37 | 234 | 49 | 166 | 400 | 473 |
Matrix |
0.016 | PRE | 67 | 153 | 32 | 252 | 56 | 131 | 383 | 445 |
Sencor |
0.5 | PRE | 59 | 159 | 37 | 254 | 56 | 143 | 397 | 451 |
Prowl + Matrix |
1.0 + 0.016 | PRE | 61 | 162 | 27 | 250 | 49 | 187 | 437 | 512 |
Prowl + Eptam |
1.0 + 3.0 | PRE | 71 | 151 | 30 | 252 | 52 | 168 | 419 | 490 |
Prowl + Eptam + Sencor |
1.0 + 3.0 + 0.5 | PRE | 46 | 164 | 58 | 267 | 57 | 149 | 416 | 469 |
Prowl + Matrix |
1.0 + 0.016 | PRE + POST | 59 | 155 | 49 | 263 | 52 | 172 | 435 | 503 |
Prowl |
1.0 | PRE | 62 | 161 | 41 | 264 | 55 | 157 | 421 | 484 |
Dual Magnum |
1.9 | PRE | 53 | 137 | 39 | 229 | 52 | 137 | 366 | 441 |
Dual II Magnum |
1.9 | PRE | 69 | 162 | 38 | 268 | 56 | 141 | 409 | 476 |
Dual |
2.0 | PRE | 59 | 170 | 31 | 259 | 60 | 113 | 372 | 436 |
BAS 656 07 H + Matrix |
0.64 + 0.016 | PRE + POST | 54 | 148 | 59 | 261 | 56 | 153 | 413 | 462 |
Untreated |
- | - | 66 | 92 | 4 | 162 | 64 | 24 | 186 | 252 |
LSD (0.05) |
NS | 33 | 23 | 45 | 7 | 37 | 57 | 62 | ||
Table 7. Potato injury and yield in response to BAS 656 07 H applications, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 1998.
| Injury | US number ones | Total | ||||||||||||
Treatment |
Rate |
Field rate | 6-5 |
6-20 |
4-6 oz |
6-12 oz |
>12 oz |
Total |
% |
Two's |
Market- able |
Yield | ||
| lb ai/acre | ---------------------cwt/acre------------------ | % | -------------cwt/acre------------- | |||||||||||
Frontier 6.0 |
2.34 | 2´ | 23 | 0 | 58 | 134 | 29 | 220 | 48 | 177 | 397 | 461 | ||
BAS 656 07 H |
0.64 | 1´ | 9 | 0 | 57 | 138 | 25 | 219 | 46 | 191 | 410 | 482 | ||
BAS 656 07 H |
1.28 | 2´ | 24 | 0 | 61 | 139 | 20 | 220 | 47 | 178 | 398 | 469 | ||
Dual |
4.0 | 2´ | 11 | 0 | 62 | 121 | 23 | 206 | 45 | 192 | 398 | 460 | ||
Prowl |
3.0 | 2´ | 1 | 0 | 60 | 155 | 39 | 253 | 49 | 197 | 450 | 522 | ||
Untreated |
- | - | 0 | 0 | 58 | 131 | 30 | 218 | 46 | 182 | 400 | 475 | ||
LSD (0.05) Injury LSD (0.10) Yields |
9 | NS | NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
42 |
44 | ||||
Malheur Agricultural Experiment
Station
| Malheur Experiment Station Web Site Purpose and Policy | OSU Home Page | OSU disclaimer |
Last updated January 17th, 2013.