|
Eric Eldredge, Clint Shock, and Monty Saunders
Malheur Experiment Station
Oregon State University
Ontario, OR
Introduction
The sugar beet industry, in cooperation with the University of Idaho and Oregon State University, tests sugar beet varieties at three replicate locations each year to identify cultivars with high sugar yield and root quality. A seed advisory committee evaluates the combined data to decide which varieties growers can plant. This report provides the agronomic practices, experimental procedures, and beet yields and quality for the Malheur Experiment Station replicate of the trials.
Methods
Sugar beet varieties were entered by ACH Seeds, Betaseed, Hilleshog Mono Hy, Holly Hybrids-Spreckels, and Seedex, with 22 varieties in the Commercial Trial, and 29 varieties (including check varieties) in the Experimental Trial. All seed for the Commercial trial was organized by Ron Roemer of the University of Idaho, as were most of the seed of varieties in the Experimental trial. Sugar beets were grown in a field that had grown winter wheat the year before. The Greenleaf silt loam received 50 lb/acre N plus 50 lb/acre P fall fertilizer, the field was then plowed, disked, groundhogged, and fall bedded on 22-inch rows.
The results of a soil test taken on March 30, 2000, showed 11 ppm nitrate-N and 5 ppm ammonium-N in the first ft of soil; 13 ppm nitrate-N and 4 ppm ammonium-N in the second ft; 23 ppm extractable phosphorus, 1.4 ppm exchangeable zinc, pH 6.8, and 1.5 percent organic matter. Winter annual weed seedlings were controlled with Roundup herbicide at 0.5 gallon/acre applied on March 25. Nortron SC preplant herbicide was applied at 6 pints/acre and incorporated using a spiked-tooth harrow on April 3.
The Experimental Trial was planted on April 4, and the Commercial Trial was planted on April 5. Seeds were planted with a John Deere model 71 flexi-planter with double disc furrow openers equipped with cone seeders to uniformly distribute the seed at a seeding rate of 12 viable seeds/ft of row. Plots of each variety were four rows wide by 23 ft. long, with a 4-ft alley separating plots. Each entry was replicated eight times in a randomized complete block design. On April 6 the field was corrugated and Counter 20CR was applied in a band over the row at 8 lb/acre. On April 7, the field was furrow irrigated to promote uniform emergence. The sugar beet seedling emergence was very uniform, and most varieties had 1-inch-long cotyledons by April 23, prior to the second irrigation on April 24. On May 3, Betamix Progress was broadcast at 1.37 pint/acre. On May 12 through 15, seedlings were pulled by hand to thin the stand to one plant every 7 inches in the row. The variety trials were cultivated and sidedressed with urea at a rate of 177 lb N/acre, and recultivated on May 19. The field was irrigated the third time on May 19. On May 23 sugar beet root maggot was discovered in the field. The maggots had not been adequately controlled by the Counter 20CR that had already been applied. To control sugar beet root maggot, the sugar beets were sidedressed on one side of each row with Temik 15G at 10 lb/acre, and recorrugated on May 24, and irrigated for the fourth time, to move the insecticide with the wetting front into the sugar beet seedlings' root zone.
On June 28 Sulfur Flowable 6 was applied by aerial applicator at 4 quart/acre for control of powdery mildew. The field was hand weeded on July 7. Sulfur dust was applied by aerial applicator at 30 lb/acre on July 11. The field was recorrugated July 17, and hand weeded on August 2. On August 3 sulfur at 30 lb/acre was applied by aerial applicator, and again on August 28 with a double application of Sulfur at 50 lb/acre. Irrigations through the summer were scheduled with Watermark (Irrometer Co. Inc., Riverside, CA) soil moisture sensors to maintain the soil water potential wetter than -70 centibar at 10-inch depth in the beet row. The last irrigation was on September 19.
Sugar beets from the Commercial Trial were harvested on October 10 and 11, and from the Experimental Trial on October 11 and 18. Foliage was flailed and crowns were removed with rotating knives. All beets in the center two rows of every plot were dug with a two-row wheel-lifter harvester and weighed, and two samples of eight sugar beets were taken in each plot. Samples were taken each day to the Amalgamated Sugar, LLC plant in Nyssa for analysis of percent sucrose (Sug), pulp nitrate concentration, and conductivity (Cond). The percent extraction (Ext) was calculated using the formula:
Ext = 250 + [(1,255.2 * Cond) - (15,000 * Sug) - 6,185] / Sug * (98.66 - 7.845 * Cond)
The weight of sugar beets from each plot was tared 5 percent to estimate beet yields. Variety differences in yield, sucrose content, conductivity, percent extraction, and estimated recoverable sugar were calculated using ANOVA. Sugar beet performance in both trials was compared to the check varieties ACH Seeds 'ACH Mustang', Betaseed 'Beta 8757', and Hilleshog Mono Hy 'HM Owyhee' and 'HM PM21'.
Results
Stand establishment was very uniform in this year's sugar beet variety trials at Malheur Experiment Station. Prolonged hot weather in the summer promoted powdery mildew infection on sugar beet foliage in the trials; it was not effectively controlled by sulfur dust, as was also experienced in growers' fields in the vicinity.
Variety performance was grouped by seed company for the Commercial Trial (Table 1) and the Experimental Trial (Table 2). Within each seed company's varieties, varieties are ranked in descending order of estimated recoverable sugar in pounds per acre. Root yield in the Commercial Trial averaged 36.9 tared ton/acre, with average sugar content 17.66 percent, and average estimated recoverable sugar 11,385 lb/acre. 'SX Puma', with estimated recoverable sugar 12,336 lb/acre, 'Beta 8919', with estimated recoverable sugar 12,167 lb/acre, 'Beta 8220B', with estimated recoverable sugar 12,004 lb/acre, 'Beta 4035R', with estimated recoverable sugar 11,912 lb/acre, 'Beta 4490R', with estimated recoverable sugar 11,758 lb/acre, 'Beta 8757', with estimated recoverable sugar 11,454 lb/acre, 'HM PM21', with estimated recoverable sugar 12,034 lb/acre, 'HM Dillon', with estimated recoverable sugar 12,003 lb/acre, 'HM Oasis', with estimated recoverable sugar 11,992 lb/acre, 'HM Owyhee', with estimated recoverable sugar 11,487 lb/acre, and 'ACH Mustang', with estimated recoverable sugar 11,727 lb/acre, were among the highest yielding varieties in the Commercial Trial.
Root yield in the Experimental Trial (Table 2) averaged 40.8 tared ton/acre, with average sugar content 17.54 percent, and average estimated recoverable sugar 12,537 lb/acre. The varieties yielding the highest estimated recoverable sugar were 'HH 00HX0032' with 14,059 lb/acre, 'HH 00HX0033' with 13,777 lb/acre, 'Beta 7CG6000' with 13,915 lb/acre, 'Beta 8KG6976' with 13,756 lb/acre, 'Crystal 0003' with 13,365 lb/acre, 'SX 1516' with 13,329 lb/acre, and 'HM 2985RZ' with 13,231 lb/acre.
Table 1. Commercial sugar beet variety root yield, sugar content, root quality, and recoverable sugar from varieties entered in the trial at Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2000.
| Root | Sugar | Gross | Conductivity | Extraction | Estimated | ||
| yield | content | sugar | recoverable sugar | ||||
| Variety | ton/acre | % | lb/ton | mmho | % | lb/ton | lb/acre |
| ACH Seeds | |||||||
| ACH Mustang | 38.1 | 17.72 | 13,499 | 0.617 | 86.87 | 308 | 11,727 |
| ACH Tomcat | 36.5 | 17.37 | 12,686 | 0.610 | 86.88 | 302 | 11,027 |
| Betaseed | |||||||
| Beta 8919 | 37.1 | 18.70 | 13,865 | 0.561 | 87.75 | 328 | 12,167 |
| Beta 8220B | 39.2 | 17.51 | 13,736 | 0.574 | 87.37 | 306 | 12,004 |
| Beta 4035R | 40.1 | 17.11 | 13,704 | 0.604 | 86.91 | 297 | 11,912 |
| Beta 4490R | 37.9 | 17.81 | 13,511 | 0.605 | 87.03 | 310 | 11,758 |
| Beta 8757 | 37.3 | 17.72 | 13,205 | 0.626 | 86.75 | 308 | 11,454 |
| Beta 8348 | 36.0 | 17.02 | 12,262 | 0.536 | 87.76 | 299 | 10,769 |
| Beta 8468 | 34.6 | 17.67 | 12,222 | 0.601 | 87.07 | 308 | 10,639 |
| Beta 4470R | 33.7 | 18.01 | 12,145 | 0.584 | 87.33 | 315 | 10,607 |
| Beta 8422 | 33.8 | 17.89 | 12,087 | 0.606 | 87.04 | 311 | 10,520 |
| Beta 8118 | 33.8 | 17.70 | 11,946 | 0.611 | 86.93 | 308 | 10,386 |
| Hilleshog Mono Hy | |||||||
| HM PM21 | 38.4 | 17.66 | 13,575 | 0.476 | 88.64 | 313 | 12,034 |
| HM Dillon | 39.1 | 17.40 | 13,597 | 0.505 | 88.23 | 307 | 12,003 |
| HM Oasis | 39.1 | 17.44 | 13,629 | 0.525 | 87.99 | 307 | 11,992 |
| HM Owyhee | 37.1 | 17.52 | 12,984 | 0.489 | 88.45 | 310 | 11,487 |
| HM Sierra | 36.3 | 17.67 | 12,817 | 0.521 | 88.08 | 311 | 11,289 |
| HM 2980 | 37.2 | 17.53 | 13,021 | 0.646 | 86.45 | 303 | 11,256 |
| HM 1642 | 32.0 | 17.86 | 11,419 | 0.528 | 88.02 | 315 | 10,057 |
| Holly Hybrids-Spreckels | |||||||
| HH 120 | 38.6 | 17.94 | 13,840 | 0.628 | 86.77 | 311 | 12,009 |
| Seedex | |||||||
| SX Puma | 39.9 | 17.52 | 13,968 | 0.501 | 88.31 | 309 | 12,336 |
| SX Blazer | 35.5 | 17.83 | 12,638 | 0.576 | 87.40 | 312 | 11,047 |
| Mean | 36.9 | 17.66 | 13,016 | 0.570 | 87.46 | 309 | 11,385 |
| LSD (.05) | 2.8 | 0.27 | 991 | 0.046 | 0.62 | 6.3 | 892 |
| LSD (.1) | 2.3 | 0.23 | 830 | 0.039 | 0.52 | 5.2 | 747 |
| CV (%) | 7.6 | 1.6 | 7.7 | 8.2 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 7.9 |
| Pr > F | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 |
Table 2. Experimental sugar beet variety root yield, sugar content, root quality, and recoverable sugar from varieties entered in the trial at Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2000.
| Root | Sugar | Gross | Conductivity | Extraction | Estimated | ||
| yield | content | sugar | recoverable sugar | ||||
| Variety | ton/acre | % | lb/ton | mmho | % | lb/ton | lb/acre |
| ACH Seeds | |||||||
| Crystal 0003 | 42.3 | 17.99 | 15,190 | 0.533 | 88.0 | 316 | 13,365 |
| Crystal 0002 | 41.8 | 17.64 | 14,748 | 0.558 | 87.6 | 309 | 12,921 |
| ACH Mustang | 41.0 | 17.59 | 14,431 | 0.618 | 86.8 | 306 | 12,530 |
| Crystal 0001 | 40.3 | 17.26 | 13,912 | 0.596 | 87.0 | 301 | 12,112 |
| Crystal 9906 | 38.7 | 17.39 | 13,451 | 0.564 | 87.5 | 304 | 11,768 |
| Crystal 9908 | 36.7 | 17.51 | 12,850 | 0.628 | 86.7 | 304 | 11,136 |
| Betaseed | |||||||
| Beta 7CG6000 | 45.0 | 17.67 | 15,903 | 0.566 | 87.5 | 309 | 13,915 |
| Beta 8KG6976 | 45.9 | 17.14 | 15,729 | 0.562 | 87.5 | 300 | 13,756 |
| Beta 8CG7305 | 41.2 | 18.25 | 15,047 | 0.597 | 87.2 | 318 | 13,121 |
| Beta 8CG7299 | 41.4 | 17.91 | 14,841 | 0.612 | 87.0 | 312 | 12,907 |
| Beta 7CG5936 | 40.7 | 17.76 | 14,479 | 0.453 | 89.0 | 316 | 12,882 |
| Beta 7KJ5073 | 39.6 | 17.28 | 13,681 | 0.598 | 87.0 | 301 | 11,907 |
| Beta 8757 | 38.6 | 17.44 | 13,448 | 0.588 | 87.2 | 304 | 11,724 |
| Hilleshog Mono Hy | |||||||
| HM 2985RZ | 43.7 | 17.20 | 15,040 | 0.523 | 88.0 | 303 | 13,231 |
| HM PM21 | 42.1 | 17.47 | 14,706 | 0.481 | 88.6 | 310 | 13,021 |
| HM 2984RZ | 42.7 | 17.26 | 14,720 | 0.512 | 88.1 | 304 | 12,971 |
| HM 2983RZ | 40.4 | 17.21 | 13,902 | 0.539 | 87.8 | 302 | 12,199 |
| HM Owyhee | 40.0 | 17.30 | 13,824 | 0.527 | 87.9 | 304 | 12,156 |
| Holly Hybrids-Spreckels | |||||||
| HH 00HX0032 | 45.2 | 17.68 | 15,968 | 0.522 | 88.1 | 312 | 14,059 |
| HH 00HX0033 | 44.4 | 17.50 | 15,546 | 0.475 | 88.6 | 310 | 13,777 |
| HH 99HX901 | 38.6 | 18.09 | 13,963 | 0.598 | 87.2 | 316 | 12,176 |
| HH 99HX905 | 38.6 | 17.71 | 13,605 | 0.551 | 87.7 | 311 | 11,922 |
| HH 97HX706 | 36.6 | 18.27 | 13,359 | 0.506 | 88.4 | 323 | 11,805 |
| HH 00HX0035 | 36.5 | 17.53 | 12,801 | 0.466 | 88.7 | 311 | 11,359 |
| HH 00HX0036 | 34.6 | 18.14 | 12,543 | 0.576 | 87.5 | 317 | 10,972 |
| Seedex | |||||||
| SX 1516 | 42.7 | 17.63 | 15,038 | 0.477 | 88.6 | 313 | 13,329 |
| SX 1515 | 42.4 | 16.84 | 14,262 | 0.423 | 89.2 | 300 | 12,714 |
| SX 1517 | 41.8 | 16.84 | 14,079 | 0.612 | 86.8 | 292 | 12,217 |
| SX 1518 | 38.6 | 17.29 | 13,339 | 0.583 | 87.2 | 302 | 11,634 |
| Mean | 40.8 | 17.54 | 14,290 | 0.546 | 87.7 | 308 | 12,537 |
| LSD (0.05) | 2.8 | 0.41 | 931 | 0.032 | 0.4 | 7.9 | 820 |
| LSD (0.10) | 2.4 | 0.34 | 780 | 0.027 | 0.4 | 6.6 | 687 |
| CV (%) | 7.0 | 2.4 | 6.6 | 6.1 | 0.5 | 2.6 | 6.6 |
| Pr > F | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 |
Malheur Agricultural Experiment
Station
| Malheur Experiment Station Web Site Purpose and Policy | OSU Home Page | OSU disclaimer |
Last updated Tuesday July 30, 2002 .