|
Weed control is essential for the production of marketable onions. Weed control in onions is difficult compared to many crops because of the lack of a complete crop canopy. Often combinations of postemergence and soil-active herbicides are required to improve overall weed control. Weed control research is important in identifying potential herbicides and management strategies to improve weed control in onions.
Methods
General ProceduresTrials were conducted at the Malheur Experiment Station to evaluate experimental and registered herbicides, and postemergence urea ammonium nitrate (32 percent N) solution applications for weed control and onion tolerance. The effect of spray volume on weed control and onion tolerance was also evaluated. Trials were conducted under furrow irrigation. All herbicide treatments were applied with a CO2-pressurized backpack sprayer calibrated to deliver 20 gal/acre at 30 psi.
On March 29, onions (cv. 'Vision', Petoseed, Payette, ID) were planted at a 3.7-inch spacing in double rows on 22-inch beds. Plots were four rows wide and 27 ft long and arranged in a randomized complete block design with three or four replications. Lorsban was applied in a 6-inch band over each row at 3.7 oz/1,000 ft of row. Onions were sidedressed with 150 lb N/acre as urea on May 23. Registered insecticides and fungicides were applied for thrips and downy mildew control. Weed control and onion injury were evaluated throughout the season. Onions were harvested September 18 and graded by size on September 19 and 20.
Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and means were separated using a protected least significant difference (LSD) at the 5 percent level (0.05).
Soil-Active Herbicides for Weed Control in Onions
The soil-active herbicides Prowl, Dacthal, Dual Magnum, and Outlook
were evaluated for crop injury and weed control applied either preemergence,
to two-leaf onions, or as a lay-by treatment. Preemergence applications
of Roundup (0.375 lb ai/acre) plus Prowl (0.75 or 1.0 lb ai/acre) or Dacthal
(8.0 or 10.0 lb ai/acre) followed by sequential postemergence herbicide
applications were compared to treatments where Prowl, Dacthal, Dual Magnum,
and Outlook were applied in combination with the postemergence herbicides
or as a lay-by application. In several treatments Prowl (0.63 or 1.0 lb
ai/acre) was applied to flag leaf onions instead of preemergence with Roundup.
Postemergence treatments of Buctril (0.15 lb ai/acre) plus Poast (0.1 lb
ai/acre) were applied on May 19 to two-leaf onions, followed by Buctril
(0.25 lb ai/acre) and Goal (0.125 lb ai/acre) applied on May 31 to four-leaf
onions. Dacthal (6.0 lb ai/acre), Outlook (0.64, 0.33, 0.66 lb ai/acre),
and Prowl (0.63 lb ai/acre) were added to the two-leaf application in several
treatments to compare residual control with these products at various rates
in combination with the postemergence herbicides. Lay-by treatments applied
on June 15 consisted of Goal (0.25 or 0.125 lb ai/acre) alone or in combination
with Prowl (0.75 lb ai/acre), Dacthal (6, 8, or 12 lb ai/acre), Dual Magnum
(1.3 lb ai/acre), or Outlook (0.33, 0.64 lb ai/acre).
Onion Tolerance to Valor Combinations
Onions were evaluated for tolerance to postemergence applications of
Valor herbicide. All plots received Roundup (0.375 lb ai/acre) preemergence
on April 17 and Select (0.125 lb ai/acre) applied postemergence on May
18. Treatments applied May 19 to two-leaf onions included Valor (0.063,
0.094, or 0.125 lb ai/acre) applied either with a non-ionic surfactant
(NIS) (0.25 percent v/v) or Buctril (0.15 lb ai/acre), Goal (0.125
lb ai/acre), and Goal plus Buctril. On June 15, Valor or Goal were applied
to six-leaf onions. Plots were hand weeded on June 1, July 5 and 16, and
August 7 to eliminate competition from escaped weeds.
Weed Control with Postemergence Nitrogen Applications
A trial was conducted to evaluate weed control from postemergence 32
percent N applications in onions. Treatments consisted of 32 percent N
applied in a separate application as part of a postemergence herbicide
program. Thirty-two percent N was applied at 20 or 30 gal/acre to flag
leaf or one-leaf onions on April 26 or May 7, respectively. Treatments
using preemergence applications of either Roundup (0.375 lb ai/acre) plus
Prowl (1.0 lb ai/acre) or Roundup plus Dacthal (8.0 lb ai/acre) were applied
on April 16. Following 32 percent N application, various combinations of
Buctril (0.05, 0.15, or 0.25 lb ai/acre), Poast (0.1 lb ai/acre), and Goal
(0.125 or 0.25 lb ai/acre) were applied to onions beginning at the two-leaf
stage with final application at the six-leaf stage.
Spray Volume Effects on Weed Control and Onion Injury
Weed control and onion injury were evaluated with postemergence applications
of Buctril and/or Goal at various rates and with spray volumes of 35 or
100 gal/acre. Treatments included Goal at 0.125 and 0.25 lb ai/acre in
both 35 and 100 gal/acre spray volumes. Other treatments were Buctril (0.25
lb ai/acre) applied at both spray volumes; Buctril plus Goal (0.25 lb ai/acre)
applied in 100 gal/acre spray volume; and an untreated check. All treatments
were applied twice, with the first application made to two-leaf onions
(May 19) and the second application applied to four-leaf onions (May 31).
The entire experimental area received Roundup (0.375 lb ai/acre) applied
preemergence on April 17 and Select (0.125 lb ai/acre) plus crop oil concentrate
(1 percent v/v) on May 18. Weed and onion biomass samples were collected
from 5-ft sections of the second row in each plot on July 16. These samples
were used to evaluate weed competition effect on onion yield.
Results and Discussion
Soil-Active Herbicides for Weed Control in Onions
All treated plots exhibited injury (7 to 28 percent on May 24 and 13
to 18 percent on June 27) (Table 1). Injury was greatest on May 24 in plots
receiving postemergence applications including Buctril applied to two-leaf
onions followed by Buctril plus Goal applied to four-leaf onions. Treatments
including preemergence and lay-by applications of Prowl or Dacthal provided
similar control of redroot pigweed, common lambsquarters, and hairy nightshade
(Table 1). The split application of Dacthal (6.0 lb ai/acre) applied at
the two-leaf timing and as a lay-by provided greater hairy nightshade control
compared to Dacthal (12.0 lb ai/acre) applied only as a lay-by. Dacthal
(6.0 lb ai/acre) applied to two-leaf onions and as a lay-by provided greater
control of redroot pigweed than Dacthal (8.0 lb ai/acre) preemergence in
combination with Dual Magnum or Outlook applied as a lay-by. All treatments
gave 90 percent or better control of common lambsquarters; however, Dual
Magnum lay-by gave significantly better control of common lambsquarters
than did Outlook. Outlook plus Buctril (0.15 lb ai/acre) applied at the
two-leaf timing increased hairy nightshade control over Outlook alone and
Outlook plus Goal applied to two-leaf onions. Small onion yields were similar
among treatments and were greatest for the untreated check (Table 1). Medium
onion yields were not significantly different among treatments. In general,
plots receiving soil-active herbicide applications included with Buctril
plus Poast at the two-leaf application timing produced the greatest onion
yields in terms of jumbo, colossal, and total onion yield (Table 1).
Onion Tolerance to Valor Combinations
On May 24, 5 days after the two-leaf application, injury associated
with herbicide treatment was significantly greater than the untreated check
(Table 2). Crop injury associated with Valor plus NIS treatments ranged
from 44 to 49 percent and were similar regardless of application rate.
Valor plus NIS produced significantly greater crop injury than all other
treatments on May 24. Twelve days after the six-leaf application (June
27) all treatments except Valor (0.063 lb ai/acre) plus Buctril caused
significant injury (5 to 11 percent). Injury was not significant for any
treatment on July 11. Despite substantial early season injury, onion yields
were not different among treatments (Table 2). Although the experimental
data show no differences in onion yield, the visual injury associated with
Valor treatment was not commercially acceptable.
Weed Control with Postemergence Nitrogen Applications
Late season (September 11) redroot pigweed, common lambsquarters,
and hairy nightshade control were highest when Roundup plus Prowl were
followed by Buctril (0.05 lb ai/acre) applied to one-leaf onions (Table
3). Total postemergence treatments including 32 percent N provided similar
weed control regardless of the number of 32 percent N applications or the
application rate. In plots receiving postemergence treatments only, Buctril
(0.05 lb ai/acre) applied at the one-leaf timing provided greater hairy
nightshade control at both evaluation dates than 32 percent N applied at
the same timing. Onion injury from 32 percent N and/or herbicide treatment
was higher than the untreated check 5 days after two-leaf application (May
24) and 12 days after six-leaf application (June 27) (Table 4). There were
only slight differences in injury among treatments ranging from 13 to 20
percent on May 24 and 13 to 19 percent on June 27. Small and medium onion
yields were highest among the untreated plots and those receiving postemergence
applications of 32 percent N at 30 gal/acre applied to one-leaf onions
and split applications of 32 percent N at 20 gal/acre applied to flag leaf
and one-leaf onions (Table 4). Jumbo onion yields were greatest in plots
that received preemergence applications of Roundup plus Prowl with and
without buctril applied to one-leaf onions, and those receiving Buctril
at the one-leaf timing. Colossal as well as total onion yields were significantly
higher with treatments including preemergence applications of Roundup plus
Prowl.
Spray Volume Effects on Weed Control and Onion Injury
Onion injury associated with herbicide treatment was significantly
greater than the untreated check 5 days after two-leaf application on May
24 (Table 5). Injury ranging from 12 to 26 percent was generally similar
among treatments with the highest injury in plots treated with Goal (0.25
lb ai/acre) and Buctril plus Goal each applied in 100 gal/acre spray volume.
On June 27, visible injury ranged from 0 to 9 percent and was observed
in plots treated with Goal (0.25 lb ai/acre), Buctril (0.25 lb ai/acre)
and Buctril plus Goal, all applied in 100 gal/acre spray volume. Redroot
pigweed control on both evaluation dates was greatest with treatments including
Goal at 0.25 lb ai/acre alone and in combination with Buctril and was not
affected by spray volume. Goal applied at 0.25 lb ai/acre provided greater
redroot pigweed control on July 17 compared to Goal at 0.125 lb ai/acre
regardless of spray volume. Common lambsquarters control was greatest in
plots receiving Buctril at 0.25 lb ai/acre and with the tank-mix of Buctril
plus Goal (Table 5). Common lambsquarters control on July 11 with Buctril
(0.25 lb ai/acre) was 93 percent when applied in 35 gal/acre spray volume
compared to 70 percent applied in 100 gal/acre spray volume. Goal provided
greater common lambsquarters control when applied at the higher rate regardless
of spray volume. All treatments that included Buctril provided greater
than 88 and 84 percent hairy nightshade control on June 27 and July 11,
respectively (Table 5). Hairy nightshade control with Goal treatments ranged
from 34 to 61 percent on June 27 and from 0 to 27 percent on July 11. Total
dry weed biomass correlated well with total dry onion yield (Fig. 1).
Table 1. Onion injury, weed control, and yield response to soil-active herbicides, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2001.
| Injury | Weed control† | Onion yield | ||||||||||||
| Treatment | Rate | Timing* | 5-24 | 6-27 | Redroot pigweed | Commonlambsquarters | Hairynightshade | Small | Medium | Jumbo | Colossal | Total | ||
| lb ai/acre | Leaf | --------------------------------------- % --------------------------------------- | -------------------------------- cwt/acre -------------------------------- | |||||||||||
| Untreated | -- | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34 | ||
| Hand-Weeded | -- | -- | 0 | 0 | 95 | 98 | 93 | 12 | 57 | 588 | 171 | 837 | ||
| Roundup + ProwlBuctril + PoastBuctril + GoalGoal + Prowl | 0.375 + 0.750.15 + 0.10.25 + 0.1250.25 + 0.75 | PRE2-leaf4-leafLay-by | 23 | 17 | 68 | 100 | 72 | 10 | 49 | 634 | 120 | 818 | ||
| Roundup + DacthalBuctril + PoastBuctril + GoalGoal + Dacthal | 0.375 + 8.00.15 + 0.10.25 + 0.1250.25 + 8.0 | PRE2-leaf4-leafLay-by | 22 | 15 | 69 | 98 | 73 | 19 | 81 | 598 | 84 | 789 | ||
| Roundup + DacthalBuctril + PoastBuctril + GoalGoal + Dacthal | 0.375 + 10.00.15 + 0.10.25 + 0.1250.25 + 12.0 | PRE2-leaf4-leafLay-by | 28 | 15 | 76 | 96 | 73 | 14 | 89 | 669 | 61 | 839 | ||
| Roundup + ProwlBuctril + PoastBuctril + GoalGoal + Dacthal | 0.375 + 1.00.15 + 0.10.25 + 0.1250.25 + 8.0 | PRE2-leaf4-leafLay-by | 22 | 15 | 75 | 100 | 87 | 13 | 64 | 677 | 198 | 960 | ||
| Roundup + ProwlBuctril + Poast + DacthalBuctril + GoalGoal + Dacthal | 0.375 + 1.00.15 + 0.1 +6.00.25 + 0.1250.25 + 6.0 | PRE2-leaf4-leafLay-by | 15 | 15 | 85 | 100 | 78 | 13 | 62 | 756 | 209 | 1047 | ||
| Roundup + ProwlBuctril + PoastBuctril + GoalGoal + Dacthal | 0.375 + 1.00.15 + 0.10.25 + 0.1250.25 + 12.0 | PRE2-leaf4-leafLay-by | 18 | 18 | 73 | 100 | 93 | 11 | 64 | 696 | 152 | 926 | ||
| Roundup + DacthalBuctril + PoastBuctril + GoalGoal + Dacthal | 0.375 + 8.00.15 + 0.10.25 + 0.1250.25 + 12.0 | PRE2-leaf4-leafLay-by | 23 | 14 | 73 | 100 | 74 | 18 | 75 | 620 | 125 | 838 | ||
| Table 1. (continued) Onion injury, weed control, and yield response to soil-active herbicides. | ||||||||||||||
| Injury | Weed control† | Onion yield | ||||||||||||
| Treatment | Rate | Timing* | 5-24 | 6-27 | Redrootpigweed | Commonlambsquarters | Hairynightshade | Small | Medium | Jumbo | Colossal | Total | ||
| Roundup + DacthalBuctril + PoastBuctril + GoalGoal + Dual Magnum | 0.375 + 8.00.15 + 0.10.25 + 0.1250.25 + 1.3 | PRE2-leaf4-leafLay-by | 23 | 18 | 73 | 98 | 69 | 11 | 67 | 535 | 64 | 691 | ||
| Roundup + DacthalBuctril + PoastBuctril + GoalGoal + Outlook | 0.375 + 8.00.15 + 0.10.25 + 0.1250.25 + 0.64 | PRE2-leaf4-leafLay-by | 17 | 15 | 69 | 90 | 70 | 12 | 89 | 611 | 86 | 804 | ||
| Roundup + ProwlBuctril + Poast + OutlookBuctril + GoalGoal | 0.375 + 1.00.15 + 0.1 +0.640.25 + 0.1250.25 | PRE2-leaf4-leafLay-by | 21 | 13 | 75 | 98 | 88 | 9 | 63 | 702 | 156 | 935 | ||
| RoundupProwlBuctril + Poast + Outlook + ProwlBuctril + GoalGoal + Outlook | 0.3750.630.15 + 0.3 +0.33 + 0.630.25 + 0.1250.25 + 0.33 | PREflag leaf2-leaf4-leafLay-by | 27 | 15 | 83 | 100 | 86 | 8 | 37 | 773 | 238 | 1065 | ||
| RoundupProwlOutlookBuctril + GoalGoal | 0.3751.00.660.25 + 0.1250.25 | PREflag leaf2-leaf4-leafLay-by | 7 | 15 | 59 | 92 | 64 | 21 | 87 | 562 | 76 | 751 | ||
| RoundupProwlBuctril + Poast + OutlookBuctril + GoalGoal | 0.3751.00.15 + 0.66 + 0.380.25 + 0.1250.25 | PREflag leaf2-leaf4-leafLay-by | 27 | 15 | 69 | 100 | 98 | 9 | 42 | 734 | 214 | 1009 | ||
| RoundupProwlPoast + Outlook + GoalBuctril + GoalGoal | 0.3751.00.38 + 0.66 + 0.1250.25 + 0.1250.25 | PREflag leaf2-leaf4-leafLay-by | 21 | 15 | 85 | 100 | 73 | 10 | 57 | 712 | 191 | 977 | ||
| LSD (0.05) | 6 | 4 | 12 | 6 | 13 | 12 | NS | 100 | 123 | 142 | ||||
Table 2. Onion tolerance to Valor combinations, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2001.
| Onion injury | Onion yield‡ | ||||||||||
| Treatment* | Rate | Timing† | 5-24 | 6-27 | 7-11 | Small | Medium | Jumbo | Colossal | Total | |
| lb ai/acre | Leaf | ------------- % ------------- | ------------------------------- cwt/acre ------------------------------- | ||||||||
| Untreated | -- | -- | 4 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 71 | 679 | 122 | 892 | |
| Valor + NISValor | 0.0630.063 | 2-leaf6-leaf | 49 | 10 | 0 | 11 | 45 | 738 | 236 | 1049 | |
| Valor + NISValor | 0.0940.094 | 2-leaf6-leaf | 46 | 9 | 5 | 11 | 59 | 734 | 140 | 959 | |
| Valor + NISValor | 0.1250.125 | 2-leaf6-leaf | 44 | 11 | 0 | 7 | 45 | 701 | 276 | 1041 | |
| Buctril + ValorValor | 0.15 + 0.0630.063 | 2-leaf6-leaf | 32 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 47 | 786 | 199 | 1051 | |
| Buctril + ValorValor | 0.15 + 0.0940.094 | 2-leaf
6-leaf |
30 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 52 | 738 | 192 | 1001 | |
| GoalGoal | 0.1250.125 | 2-leaf6-leaf | 18 | 11 | 0 | 10 | 49 | 718 | 234 | 1029 | |
| Buctril + GoalGoal | 0.15 + 0.1250.125 | 2-leaf6-leaf | 28 | 8 | 0 | 7 | 57 | 717 | 200 | 987 | |
| LSD (0.05) | 11 | 5 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |||
Table 3. Weed control with postemergence nitrogen applications, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2001.
| Weed control | ||||||||||
| Redroot pigweed | Common lambsquarters | Hairy nightshade | ||||||||
| Treatment | Rate | Timing* | 6-27 | 9-11 | 6-27 | 9-11 | 6-27 | 9-11 | ||
| lb ai/acre | Leaf | ----------------------------------------------- % ---------------------------------------------- | ||||||||
| Untreated | -- | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 32% NBuctril + PoastGoalBuctril + GoalGoal | 20 gal/acre0.15 + 0.10.1250.25 + 0.1250.25 | 1-leaf2-leaf3-leaf4-leaf6-leaf | 94 | 55 | 86 | 86 | 62 | 8 | ||
| Roundup + Prowl32% NBuctril + PoastGoalBuctril + GoalGoal | 0.375 + 1.020 gal/acre0.15 + 0.10.1250.25 + 0.1250.25 | PRE1-leaf2-leaf3-leaf4-leaf6-leaf | 98 | 69 | 100 | 100 | 97 | 68 | ||
| Roundup + Dacthal32% NBuctril + PoastGoalBuctril + GoalGoal | 0.375 + 8.020 gal/acre0.15 + 0.10.1250.25 + 0.1250.25 | PRE1-leaf2-leaf3-leaf4-leaf6-leaf | 92 | 56 | 91 | 84 | 78 | 10 | ||
| BuctrilBuctril + PoastGoalBuctril + GoalGoal | 0.050.15 + 0.10.1250.25 + 0.1250.25 | 1-leaf2-leaf3-leaf4-leaf6-leaf | 98 | 60 | 86 | 80 | 86 | 36 | ||
| Roundup + ProwlBuctrilBuctril + PoastGoalBuctril + GoalGoal | 0.375 + 1.00.050.15 + 0.10.1250.25 + 0.1250.25 | PRE1-leaf2-leaf3-leaf4-leaf6-leaf | 99 | 87 | 100 | 100 | 99 | 93 | ||
| 32% N32% NBuctril + PoastGoalBuctril + GoalGoal | 20 gal/acre20 gal/acre0.15 + 0.10.1250.25 + 0.1250.25 | flag1-leaf2-leaf3-leaf4-leaf6-leaf | 100 | 58 | 74 | 66 | 62 | 8 | ||
| 32% NBuctril + PoastGoalBuctril + GoalGoal | 30 gal/acre0.15 + 0.10.1250.25 + 0.1250.25 | 1-leaf2-leaf3-leaf4-leaf6-leaf | 97 | 58 | 81 | 56 | 64 | 5 | ||
| LSD (0.05) | 4 | 27 | 12 | 25 | 8 | 20 | ||||
Table 4. Onion injury and yield with postemergence nitrogen applications, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2001.
| Onion injury | Onion yield† | ||||||||||
| Treatment | Rate | Timing* | 5-24 | 6-27 | Small | Medium | Jumbo | Colossal | Total | ||
| lb ai/acre | Leaf | ---------- % ---------- | ------------------------------- cwt/acre ---------------------------- | ||||||||
| Untreated | -- | -- | 0 | 0 | 42 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 47 | ||
| 32% NBuctril + PoastGoalBuctril + GoalGoal | 20 gal/acre0.15 + 0.10.1250.25 + 0.1250.25 | 1-leaf2-leaf3-leaf4-leaf6-leaf | 13 | 15 | 18 | 141 | 488 | 27 | 682 | ||
| Roundup + Prowl32% NBuctril + PoastGoalBuctril + GoalGoal | 0.375 + 1.020 gal/acre0.15 + 0.10.1250.25 + 0.1250.25 | PRE1-leaf2-leaf3-leaf4-leaf6-leaf | 20 | 17 | 10 | 61 | 741 | 249 | 1074 | ||
| Roundup + Dacthal32% NBuctril + PoastGoalBucril + GoalGoal | 0.375 + 8.020 gal/acre0.15 + 0.10.1250.25 + 0.1250.25 | PRE1-leaf2-leaf3-leaf4-leaf6-leaf | 20 | 15 | 12 | 90 | 636 | 94 | 838 | ||
| BuctrilBuctril + PoastGoalBuctril + GoalGoal | 0.050.15 + 0.10.1250.25 + 0.1250.25 | 1-leaf2-leaf3-leaf4-leaf6-leaf | 20 | 17 | 16 | 84 | 699 | 105 | 911 | ||
| Roundup + ProwlBuctrilBuctril + PoastGoalBuctril + GoalGoal | 0.375 + 1.00.050.15 + 0.10.1250.25 + 0.1250.25 | PRE1-leaf2-leaf3-leaf4-leaf6-leaf | 18 | 19 | 12 | 59 | 767 | 255 | 1107 | ||
| 32% N32% NBuctril + PoastGoalBuctril + GoalGoal | 20 gal/acre20 gal/acre0.15 + 0.10.1250.25 + 0.1250.25 | flag1-leaf2-leaf3-leaf4-leaf6-leaf | 16 | 13 | 37 | 179 | 384 | 11 | 613 | ||
| 32% NBuctril + PoastGoalBuctril + GoalGoal | 30 gal/acre0.15 + 0.10.1250.25 + 0.1250.25 | 1-leaf2-leaf3-leaf4-leaf6-leaf | 18 | 15 | 29 | 163 | 419 | 22 | 635 | ||
| LSD (0.05) | 6 | 3 | 15 | 41 | 112 | 70 | 110 | ||||
Table 5. Spray volume effects on weed control and onion injury, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2001.
| Weed control | ||||||||||||||
| Onioninjury | Redroot pigweed | Common lambsquarters | Hairy nightshade | |||||||||||
| Treatment* | Rate | SprayVolume | Timing† | 5-24 | 6-27 | 6-27 | 7-11 | 6-27 | 7-11 | 6-27 | 7-11 | |||
| lb ai/acre | gal/acre | Leaf | ---------------------------------------------------- % ----------------------------------------------- | |||||||||||
| Untreated | -- | -- | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Goal | 0.125 | 35 | 2-lf & 4-lf | 17 | 0 | 54 | 49 | 51 | 41 | 48 | 27 | |||
| Goal | 0.25 | 35 | 2-lf & 4-lf | 20 | 0 | 83 | 85 | 83 | 82 | 34 | 0 | |||
| Goal | 0.125 | 100 | 2-lf & 4-lf | 21 | 0 | 62 | 60 | 63 | 53 | 56 | 15 | |||
| Goal | 0.25 | 100 | 2-lf & 4-lf | 26 | 4 | 83 | 81 | 81 | 79 | 61 | 22 | |||
| Buctril | 0.25 | 35 | 2-lf & 4-lf | 12 | 0 | 34 | 15 | 100 | 93 | 88 | 84 | |||
| Buctril | 0.25 | 100 | 2-lf & 4-lf | 18 | 2 | 39 | 28 | 74 | 70 | 97 | 93 | |||
| Buctril + Goal | 0.25 +0.25 | 100 | 2-lf & 4-lf | 23 | 9 | 97 | 91 | 96 | 96 | 88 | 91 | |||
| LSD (0.05) | 10 | 3 | 16 | 20 | 14 | 21 | 19 | 32 | ||||||
Figure 1. Relationship of total dry weed biomass versus total dry onion biomass in spray volume study, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University,Ontario, OR, 2001.
Malheur Agricultural Experiment
Station
| Malheur Experiment Station Web Site Purpose and Policy | OSU Home Page | OSU disclaimer |
Last updated Tuesday July 30, 2002 .