Malheur Experiment Station
Oregon State University
Information for Sustainable Agriculture

Sugar Beet Variety 2003 Testing Results

Clint Shock, Eric Eldredge, and Monty Saunders
Malheur Experiment Station
Oregon State University
Ontario, OR

Introduction

The sugar beet industry, in cooperation with Oregon State University (OSU), tests commercial and experimental sugar beet varieties at multiple locations each year to identify varieties with high sugar yield and root quality. A seed advisory committee evaluates the combined data to choose the best varieties for sugar beet production. This report provides the agronomic practices, experimental procedures, and sugar beet yields and quality for the OSU Malheur Experiment Station location of the 2003 trials.

Methods

The sugar beet trials were grown on an Owyhee silt loam that had grown winter wheat the year before. The field was plowed and disked, then 82 lb P2O5/acre, 93 lb K2O/acre, 99 lb SO4/acre, 3 lb Zn/acre, 47 lb Mg/acre, 1 lb Mn/acre, 2 lb Cu/acre, and 1 lb B/acre fertilizer was applied according to fall soil sampling results. The field was then ripped, disked, groundhogged, fumigated with Telone C17 at 20 gal/acre, and fall bedded on 22-inch rows.

On March 29 the beds were remade using a spike-tooth bed harrow and preplant herbicide Nortron SC at 6 pint/acre was applied and incorporated using the bed harrow. A soil test taken on April 3, 2003, showed 51 lb N03/acre available in the top foot of soil, 24 ppm extractable P, 322 ppm exchangeable K, 2.5 ppm Zn, pH 7.3, and 1.3 percent organic matter.

Sugar beet varieties were entered by ACH Seeds, Betaseed, Hilleshog/Syngenta, Holly Hybrids-Spreckels, and Seedex in 2003. Twenty-seven varieties were tested in the Commercial Trial, and 32 varieties (including 4 commercial check varieties) were tested in the Experimental Trial. Seed for the Commercial Trial was organized by Amalgamated. Seed of varieties in the Experimental Trial was sent by the seed companies. Both the Experimental Trial and the Commercial Trial were planted on March 31. Seeds were planted with John Deere model 71 flexi-planter units with double disc furrow openers and cone seeders fed from a spinner divider to uniformly distribute the seed. The seeding rate was 12 viable seed/ft of row. Each entry was replicated eight times in a randomized complete block design.

On April 4 Counter 20CR was applied in a band over the row at 8.6 lb/acre (5 oz/1,000 ft of row). On April 10 Roundup herbicide was applied at 1 quart/acre, and on April 11 crust busters were rolled over the rows to ensure uniform emergence. Full emergence was observed on April 14. On May 2, Betamix Progress at 24 oz/acre, Upbeet at 0.5 oz/acre, and Stinger at 3 oz/acre were applied for weed control. On May 14, urea was sidedressed to supply 170 lb N/acre. Seedlings were thinned by hand to one plant every 6.4 inches in the row on May 19 and 20.Plots of each variety were four rows wide by 23 ft long, with 4-ft alleys separating tiers of plots.The field was sidedressed with Temik at 10 lb/acre on May 21 to control sugar beet root maggot.On May 22, trifluralin was applied at 1.5 pint/acre and incorporated with an Alloway cultivator.

The field was furrow irrigated with surge irrigation from gated pipe. Irrigation was monitored with Watermark (Irrometer Co. Inc., Riverside, CA) soil moisture sensors connected to an AM400 Hansen datalogger (M.K. Hansen Co., Wenatchee, WA) to maintain the soil water potential wetter than -70 centibar at 10-inch depth in the beet row. The first irrigation was applied on May 23, for 16 hours, to move the insecticide with the wetting front into the sugar beet seedlings' root zone. The field was recorrugated the final time on June 10.

Headline fungicide was applied at 12 oz/acre by aerial applicator on June 17 for control of powdery mildew. Headline fungicide at 12 oz/acre with liquid sulfur at 12 lb S/acre was applied by aerial applicator on July 17. Sulfur dust was applied at 40 lb S/acre by aerial applicator on July 20. A petiole test was taken on July 31, and 0.2 lb B/acre was applied in the irrigation water. Topsin M at 0.5 lb/acre with 0.44 lb S/acre, 0.22 lb Fe/acre, 0.22 lb Mn/acre, and 0.33 lb Zn/acre was applied by aerial applicator on August 4. On August 7, 4.6 lb N/acre, 10 lb SO4/acre, 0.25 lb Zn/acre, and 0.25 lb Cu/acre were applied in the irrigation water. On August 11, a second petiole test was taken, and on August 14, 7.8 lb N/acre, 10.7 lb P2O5/acre, 1.2 lb K2O/acre, 9.5 lb SO4/acre, 0.02 lb B/acre, 0.01 lb Fe/acre, 0.01 lb Zn/acre, and 0.21 lb Cu/acre were applied in the irrigation water. The final irrigation was on September 23.

Sugar beets were harvested from the Commercial Trial on October 22 and 23, and from the Experimental Trial on October 23 and 24. The foliage was flailed and the crowns were removed with rotating knives. All sugar beets in the center two rows of each plot were dug with a two-row wheel-lifter harvester and weighed, and two eight-beet samples were taken from each plot. Samples were delivered each day to the Snake River Sugar factory in Nyssa for laboratory analysis of percent sucrose (Sug), nitrate concentration, and conductivity (Cond).

The root weight data were examined for outliers as is customary for calculations of sugar beet variety data by Amalgamated in these trials. Observations more than two standard deviations from the mean for each variety were deleted. Sugar sample data were checked for errors in sugar percentages and conductivity with the erroneous readings being dropped from the data set. The companion samples of all missing or deleted sugar data were good, so no plots were lost due to sugar sample errors. The weight of sugar beets from each plot was multiplied by 0.95 to estimate tare. Sugar concentrations were "factored" by multiplying measured sucrose by 0.98 to estimate the sugar that would have been lost to respiration if the beets had been stored in a pile. The data with two samples from each plot were averaged for analysis. The percent extraction (Ext) was calculated using the formula:

Ext = 250 + [(1,255.2 * Cond) - (15,000 * Sug) - 6,185] / Sug * (98.66 - 7.845 * Cond)

Variety differences in yield, sucrose content, conductivity, percent extraction, and estimated recoverable sugar were calculated using least-squares means analysis. Sugar beet performance in both trials was compared to the check varieties ACH Seeds 'Crystal 217R', Betaseed 'Beta 4490 R', Hilleshog/Syngenta 'HM2986 Rz', and Seedex 'Raptor Rz'. OSU reports of previous years' variety trials are available online at Stand establishment was excellent in the 2003 sugar beet variety trials at Malheur Experiment Station, with frequent gentle rains that totaled 1.12 inches in April and 1.52 inches in May. Record heat of 110° F on July 22, along with prolonged heat throughout the growing season, stressed the sugar beets. Hot, dry weather during the summer promoted powdery mildew infection on sugar beet foliage in growers' fields in the area. Powdery mildew developed on foliage in these trials in September. Record heat in October may have reduced potential sugar content increases.

Variety performance was grouped by seed company for the Commercial Trial (Table 1) and the Experimental Trial (Table 2). Within each seed company's varieties, the varieties are ranked in descending order of estimated recoverable sugar in pounds per acre.

Root yield in the Commercial Trial averaged 50.32 ton/acre, average sugar content was 17.27 percent, and average estimated recoverable sugar was 14,702 lb/acre. The varieties yielding among the highest estimated recoverable sugar in the Commercial Trial were 'Beta 8600' with 16,209 lb/acre, 'SX Cascade' with 15,605 lb/acre, 'HH125' with 15,564 lb/acre, 'SX Orbit' with 15,429 lb/acre, and 'Beta 8220B' with 15,388 lb/acre.

Data for the Experimental Trial are reported in Table 2. Root yield in the Experimental Trial averaged 50.22 ton/acre, with average sugar content 17.96 percent, and average estimated recoverable sugar 15,289 lb/acre. The varieties yielding among the highest estimated recoverable sugar in the Experimental Trial were 'HM2990' with 16,795 lb/acre, '03HX351RZ' with 16,315 lb/acre, 'HM2987' with 16,265 lb/acre, 'SX 1520' with 16,213 lb/acre, and 'Crystal 316 R' with 16,109 lb/acre.

Table 1. Commercial sugar beet variety root yield, sugar content, root quality, and recoverable sugar from varieties entered in the trial at Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2003.

 

Root

Sugar

Gross

Conductivity

Extraction

Estimated

 

yield

content

sugar

 

 

recoverable sugar

Variety

ton/acre

%

lb/acre

mmho

%

lb/ton

lb/acre

Hilleshog/Syngenta

 

 

 

 

 

 

HM 2980RZ

52.38

17.35

18,188

0.859

83.61

290.2

15,214

HM Oasis

50.94

17.27

17,591

0.695

85.77

296.3

15,090

HM 1642

49.25

17.75

17,494

0.766

84.91

301.5

14,867

HM PM21

49.65

17.41

17,308

0.693

85.82

298.9

14,864

HM Owyhee

51.77

16.89

17,468

0.746

85.02

287.3

14,858

HM 2984RZ

48.16

17.34

16,709

0.740

85.19

295.4

14,235

HM 2986RZ

47.81

17.35

16,598

0.736

85.23

295.8

14,156

Holly Hybrids-Spreckels

 

 

 

 

 

HH 125

50.36

17.96

18,087

0.683

86.05

309.1

15,564

PhoenixRZ

53.64

16.97

18,207

0.844

83.74

284.2

15,246

AcclaimRZ

53.30

16.79

17,906

0.879

83.23

279.6

14,912

EagleRZ

53.24

16.52

17,591

0.870

83.30

275.3

14,652

HH 120

48.92

17.14

16,770

0.823

84.05

288.3

14,099

Seedex

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SX Cascade

53.03

17.05

18,082

0.651

86.30

294.3

15,605

SX Orbit

50.30

17.84

17,955

0.694

85.88

306.5

15,429

SX RaptorRZ

51.98

17.00

17,664

0.834

83.88

285.1

14,815

SX Puma

48.46

16.93

16,377

0.703

85.59

289.8

14,023

ACH Seeds Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACH Mustang

50.45

17.20

17,359

0.818

84.13

289.4

14,609

Crystal 9906R

44.38

17.61

15,624

0.759

84.98

299.3

13,278

Crystal 217R

44.44

17.75

15,771

0.853

83.77

297.4

13,215

Betaseed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beta 8600

57.38

16.71

19,187

0.788

84.43

282.3

16,209

Beta 8220B

55.27

16.63

18,383

0.842

83.69

278.3

15,388

Beta 8859

49.13

17.74

17,430

0.650

86.43

306.7

15,056

Beta 4199R

49.22

17.85

17,575

0.829

84.10

300.3

14,783

Beta 4490R

50.11

17.32

17,357

0.818

84.16

291.6

14,612

Beta 4773R

48.02

17.65

16,952

0.825

84.12

297.0

14,264

Beta 4035R

48.58

17.26

16,770

0.826

84.02

290.2

14,095

Beta 8348

48.85

16.87

16,495

0.846

83.69

282.5

13,811

Mean

50.32

17.27

17,365

0.780

84.64

292.4

14,702

LSD (0.05)

2.66

0.48

1,018

0.053

0.75

9.8

899

LSD (0.10)

2.23

0.40

853

0.044

0.63

8.2

754

CV (percent)

5.3

2.8

5.9

6.8

0.9

3.4

6.1

Table 2. Experimental sugar beet variety root yield, sugar content, root quality, and recoverable sugar from varieties entered in the trial at Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2003.

 

Root

Sugar

Gross

Conductivity

Extraction

Estimated

 

yield

content

sugar

 

 

recoverable sugar

Variety

ton/acre

%

lb/acre

mmho

%

lb/ton

lb/acre

Hilleshog/Syngenta

 

 

 

 

 

 

HM 2990

53.00

18.40

19,489

0.681

86.15

317.0

16,795

HM 2987

50.96

18.37

18,727

0.626

86.86

319.2

16,265

HM 2988RZ

48.86

18.43

18,016

0.705

85.84

316.5

15,467

HM 2986RZ

49.71

17.90

17,800

0.764

84.98

304.3

15,128

HM 2989RZ

48.21

18.20

17,560

0.773

84.91

309.2

14,913

Holly Hybrids-Spreckels

 

 

 

 

 

 

03HX351RZ

55.36

17.47

19,349

0.809

84.30

294.6

16,315

01HX047RZ

52.41

17.88

18,738

0.691

85.92

307.3

16,100

00HX011RZ

52.08

17.76

18,501

0.679

86.06

305.7

15,931

03HX359RZ

52.57

17.44

18,332

0.854

83.69

292.0

15,344

03HX356

49.87

18.14

18,075

0.797

84.58

307.0

15,289

03HX353RZ

47.20

18.57

17,536

0.717

85.71

318.4

15,033

02HX226RZ

49.56

17.57

17,414

0.765

84.90

298.3

14,786

03HX355RZ

46.25

17.97

16,604

0.811

84.37

303.2

14,009

Seedex Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SX1520

52.01

18.11

18,828

0.681

86.10

311.8

16,213

SX RaptorRZ

52.96

17.70

18,739

0.835

84.00

297.3

15,739

SX1519

52.08

17.70

18,427

0.867