|
A Two-Year Study on Varietal Response to an
Alternative Approach for Controlling Onion Thrips (Thrips tabaci) in Spanish Onions
Lynn Jensen
Malheur County Extension
Service
Clinton Shock and Lamont
Saunders
Malheur Experiment Station
Oregon State University
Ontario, OR, 2003-2004
Introduction
Onion (Allium cepa L.) is a major economic crop in the Treasure Valley of
eastern Oregon and western Idaho. Annually about 20,000 acres of onion are
grown in the valley. Typically Spanish hybrids are grown for their large size,
high yield, and mild flavor.
The principal onion pest in
this region is onion thrips (Thrips
tabaci, Lindeman). Thrips cause yield reduction by feeding on the epidermal
cells of the plant. Onion thrips can reduce total yields from 4 to 27 percent,
depending on the onion variety, but can reduce yields of colossal-sized bulbs
from 27 to 73 percent. The larger sized colossal bulbs are difficult to grow
and demand a premium in the marketplace. Growers typically spray three to six
times per season to control onion thrips. Treatments include the use of
synthetic pyrethroid, organophosphate, and carbamate insecticides. The ability
of these products to control thrips has decreased from over 90 percent control
in 1995 to less than 70 percent control in 2000. Onion growers are applying
insecticides more frequently in order to keep thrips populations low.
New biological insecticides
with low toxicity to beneficial predators have been developed, including neem
tree (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) extracts
(azadirachtin) and bacterial fermentation products (spinosad). Both of these
materials have previously been evaluated for thrips control and have performed
poorly compared to conventional insecticides. Studies during the past 2 years
have shown that applications of spinosad and azadirachtin coupled with straw
mulch are superior to conventional insecticide programs for controlling onion
thrips in ‘Vaquero’ onions. Vaquero was used in the study because of its
vigorous growth characteristics and resistance to thrips injury compared to
slower growing varieties. The objective of this study was to test this program
on varieties that are highly susceptible to thrips injury.
Materials and Methods
A 1.5-acre field was planted
to the onion varieties Vaquero, ‘Flamenco’, and ‘Redwing’ (cv. Vaquero,
Flamenco, Nunhems, Parma, ID; Redwing, Bejo Seeds, Oceano, CA) in a split plot
design on March 14, 2003 and March 23, 2004. Vaquero is a yellow variety while
Redwing and Flamenco are red varieties. Red varieties are generally assumed to
be more attractive to thrips than yellow varieties. The onion varieties were
planted as 2 double rows on a 44-inch bed. The double rows were spaced 2 inches
apart. The seeding rate was 137,000 seeds/acre. Lorsban 15G® was
applied in a 6-inch band over each row at planting at a rate of 3.7 oz/1000 ft
of row for onion maggot control. Water was applied by furrow irrigation. The field
was divided into plots 37 ft wide by 100 ft long. There were three treatments
with six replications.
The three treatments were a
grower standard treatment, an untreated check, and the alternative treatment as
described previously (Jensen et al. 2003a, 2003b). The grower standard
treatment included Warrior® (lambda-cyhalothrin), MSR®
(oxydemeton-methyl), and Lannate® (methomyl). The untreated check
did not receive any treatments for thrips control. The alternative treatment
included straw mulch applied to the center of the bed plus Success®
(spinosad), and Aza-Direct® (azadirachtin).
Insecticide treatments were
applied 7-10 days apart during the growing season (Table 1). All insecticides
were sprayed in water at 31 gal/acre in 2003 and 39 gal/acre in 2004. Straw was
applied only between the irrigation furrows on top of the beds to avoid
confounding irrigation effects with thrips effects. The straw was applied on
May 1, 2003 at a rate of 1,080 lb/acre. Straw was not applied in 2004 because
results in 2003 suggested it was not enhancing thrips control.
Thrips populations were sampled
by two methods. The first was by visually counting the number of thrips on 20
plants. The second method was by cutting 10 plants at ground level and inserting
the plants into a berlese funnel. Turpentine used in the berlese funnel
dislodged the thrips from the plant into a jar containing 90 percent isopropyl
alcohol. The collected thrips were then counted through a binocular microscope.
Thrips populations were monitored weekly through the growing season.
The predator populations
were monitored using pitfall traps that contained ethylene glycol. They were
evaluated three times per week. The berlese funnel was also used to monitor
predators foraging on the plants. The onions were harvested in September and
graded in October of each year.
Treatment differences were
compared using ANOVA and least significant differences at the 5 percent
probability level, LSD (0.05). Means
were also compared using Duncan’s multiple range test.
Results and Discussion
Weekly thrips populations
are compared in Figure 1. The alternative program had a significantly lower
average thrips population than the untreated check in both years (Fig. 2). Visual
damage to the foliage was observed with the variety Vaquero in 2004 but not in
2003. Flamenco showed severe foliage damage from thrips feeding. The visual
thrips damage to Redwing appeared intermediate between Vaquero and Flamenco.
Flamenco is less vigorous than Redwing and more thrips damage would be
expected.
There were no yield
differences between any of the treatments with Vaquero in 2003 but the alternative treatment produced
significantly more colossal- and super-colossal-sized bulbs in 2004 (Table 2).
Redwing significantly
increased yield of colossal-sized bulbs with the alternative treatment both
years compared to both the standard and untreated check and significantly
increased in total yield in 2003 compared to the untreated check (Table 3).
Flamenco responded to the
alternative treatments with significantly less medium-size yield and higher
jumbo and colossal yield compared to the untreated check in 2003 (Table 4).
There was a trend towards higher total yield and larger bulb size compared to
the standard treatment but this was only significant in the colossal size class
in 2003. The alternative plus standard treatments produced higher total yields than
the untreated control in 2004.
Predator populations (Fig. 3)
were significantly higher in the alternative and untreated check treatments
than in the standard treatment. The predator population consisted mostly of
spiders, big-eyed bugs, minute pirate bugs, damsel bugs, lacewings and lady
bird beetles.
The 2004 season experienced
an epidemic of iris yellow spot virus (IYSV) in the trial area and surrounding
fields. The IYSV is a new disease currently spreading to most production areas
of the United States and the world. Onion thrips are the vector, so this trial
gave the opportunity to evaluate the alternative program for IYSV control
(Table 5). The treatments grown under the alternative treatment were healthier
and showed significantly less virus damage than the standard insecticide
treatment or the untreated check.
Red onions often exhibit
thrips scarring when placed in storage due to continued feeding by the insects.
The alternative treatment produced significantly fewer damaged bulbs compared
to the untreated check with the Redwing variety, and a similar though not
significant trend with Flamenco (Table 6). Averaged over treatment, Redwing had
less thrips injury than Flamenco.
Conclusion
The alternative treatments
were equal to or in some cases significantly better than the standard
insecticide program. There was a general trend towards higher yields in the
larger bulb classes, which gives a higher return to the grower. The alternative
program produced less thrips damage to red onions in storage and reduced the
incidence of iris yellow spot virus.
References
Jensen, L., B. Simko, C.
Shock, and L. Saunders 2002. Alternative methods for controlling onion thrips (Thrips tabaci) in Spanish onions. Pages
65-72 in Proceedings of the 2002
Allium Research National Conference.
Jensen, L., B. Simko, C.
Shock and L. Saunders. 2003. Alternative methods for controlling thrips. Pages
895-900 in British Crop Protection
Council: Crop Science and Technology 2003 Congress Proceedings. Vol. 2.
Jensen, L., B. Simko, C.
Shock, and L. Saunders 2003a. Alternative methods for controlling onion thrips
(Thrips tabaci) in Spanish onions. Proceedings of the 2003 Idaho-Malheur County
Onion Growers Annual Meeting Feb. 2003. 7 pages.
Jensen, L., C. Shock, B.
Simko, and L. Saunders 2003b. Straw mulch and insecticide to control onion
thrips (Thrips tabaci) in dry bulb
onions. Pages 19-30 in Proceedings of
the Pacific Northwest Vegetable Association 17th Annual Meeting.
Table 1. Application dates for thrips control on two
red and one yellow onion variety,
Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2003-2004.
|
|
Standard insecticide treatment |
Alternative insecticide treatment |
|||
|
Application date |
Insecticides applied |
Rate/acre |
Insecticides applied |
Rate/acre |
|
|
2003 |
|||||
|
June 7 |
Warrior |
3.84 oz. |
Aza-Direct Success |
20.0 oz. 10.0 oz. |
|
|
June 14 |
-------- |
------- |
Aza-Direct Success |
20.0 oz. 10.0 oz. |
|
|
June 25 |
Warrior Lannate |
3.84 oz. 3.0 oz. |
-------- |
-------- |
|
|
July 3 |
------- |
------- |
Aza-Direct Success |
20.0 oz. 10.0 oz. |
|
|
July 7 |
Warrior MSR |
3.84 oz. 2.0 pt. |
-------- |
------- |
|
|
July 11 |
------ |
------ |
Aza-Direct Success |
20.0 oz. 10.0 oz |
|
|
July 25 |
Warrior Lannate |
3.84 oz. 3.0 pt. |
------ |
------- |
|
|
July 29 |
-------- |
------- |
Aza-Direct Success |
20.0 oz 10.0 oz. |
|
|
|
|||||
|
2004 |
|||||
|
June 6 |
Warrior MSR |
3.84 oz. 2.0 pt. |
Aza-Direct Success |
20.0 oz. 10.0 oz. |
|
|
June 16 |
Warrior MSR |
3.84 oz. 2.0 pt. |
Aza-Direct Success |
20.0 oz. 10.0 oz. |
|
|
June 23 |
Warrior Lannate |
3.84 oz. 3.0 pt. |
Aza-Direct Success |
20.0 oz. 10.0 oz. |
|
|
July 1 |
Warrior Lannate |
3.84 oz. 3.0 pt. |
Aza-Direct Success |
20.0 oz. 10.0 oz. |
|
|
July 8 |
Warrior MSR |
3.84 oz. 2.0 pt. |
Aza-Direct Success |
20.0 oz. 10.0 oz. |
|
|
July 19 |
Warrior Lannate |
3.84 oz. 3.0 pt. |
Aza-Direct Success |
20.0 oz. 10.0 oz. |
|
|
July 29 |
Warrior Mustang Lannate |
3.84 oz. 4.0 oz. 3.0 pt. |
Aza-Direct Success |
20.0 oz. 10.0 oz. |
|
Table 2. Yield and grade of Vaquero onion with
different strategies for controlling onion thrips, Malheur Experiment Station,
Oregon State University, Ontario, OR.
|
2003 |
||||||||
|
Treatment |
Medium |
Jumbo |
Colossal |
Super- colossal |
|
Total yield |
|
|
|
|
|
cwt/acre |
|
|||||
|
Untreated check |
9.7 |
459.7 |
464.1 |
124.0 |
|
1057.5 |
|
|
|
Standard |
9.8 |
451.0 |
489.6 |
140.9 |
|
1091.3 |
|
|
|
Alternative |
10.9 |
446.1 |
484.2 |
145.2 |
|
1086.4 |
|
|
|
LSD (0.05) |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
|
ns |
|
|
|
2004 |
|||||||
|
Treatment |
Medium |
Jumbo |
Colossal |
Super- colossal |
|
Total yield |
|
|
|
|
cwt/acre |
|||||
|
Untreated check |
17.6 |
586.1 |
254.5 |
29.8 |
|
888.0 |
|
|
Standard |
11.9 |
511.3 |
306.9 |
52.3 |
|
882.4 |
|
|
Alternative |
14.8 |
409.3 |
377.4 |
126.9 |
|
928.4 |
|
|
LSD (0.05) |
ns |
ns |
76.9 |
71.9 |
|
ns |
|
|
Table 3. Yield and grade of Redwing onion with different
strategies for controlling onion |
||||||||
|
thrips, Malheur Experiment
Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR. |
|
|||||||
|
2003 |
||||||||
|
Treatment |
Medium |
Jumbo |
Colossal |
Super- colossal |
|
Total yield |
|
|
|
|
|
cwt/acre |
|
|||||
|
Untreated check |
12.0 |
726.4 |
107.4 |
4.0 |
|
849.8 |
|
|
|
Standard |
14.2 |
724.2 |
174.3 |
2.2 |
|
914.9 |
|
|
|
Alternative |
11.6 |
701.2 |
240.2 |
6.9 |
|
959.9 |
|
|
|
LSD (0.05) |
ns |
ns |
62.2 |
ns |
|
56.3 |
|
|
|
2004 |
|||||||
|
Treatment |
Medium |
Jumbo |
Colossal |
Super- colossal |
|
Total yield |
|
|
|
|
cwt/acre |
|||||
|
Untreated check |
57.6 |
395.1 |
9.1 |
0 |
|
461.8 |
|
|
Standard |
50.8 |
509.0 |
15.4 |
0 |
|
575.2 |
|
|
Alternative |
52.1 |
445.6 |
36.9 |
0 |
|
534.6 |
|
|
LSD (0.05) |
ns |
ns |
16.5 |
ns |
|
ns |
|
Table
4. Yield and grade of Flamenco onions with different strategies for controlling
onion thrips, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR.
2003
|
Treatments |
Medium |
Jumbo |
Colossal |
Total yield |
|
|
cwt/acre |
|||
|
Untreated check |
121.5 |
380.5 |
1.0 |
512.4 |
|
Standard |
107.1 |
442.3 |
9.2 |
565.5 |
|
Alternative |
94.0 |
486.1 |
19.1 |
606.9 |
|
LSD (0.05) |
16.9 |
55.5 |
7.8 |
51.8 |
2004
|
Treatments |
Medium |
Jumbo |
Colossal |
Total yield |
|
|
cwt/acre |
|||
|
Untreated check |
128.1 |
175.1 |
0.3 |
512.4 |
|
Standard |
101.0 |
275.3 |
1.0 |
565.5 |
|
Alternative |
82.2 |
305.9 |
10.7 |
606.9 |
|
LSD (0.05) |
ns |
ns |
ns |
51.8 |
Table
5. Average iris yellow spot virus injury for insecticide treatments, Malheur
Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2004.
|
Treatment |
IYSV* |
|
Untreated
|
1.5 |
|
Standard |
1.7 |
|
Alternative |
2.2 |
|
LSD (0.05) |
0.4 |
|
*Scale: 0 = dead, 5 = healthy, no lesions. |
|
Table 6. Thrips injury on
two stored red onion varieties, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State
University, Ontario, OR, 2003.
|
|
Thrips injury |
|
|
Treatment |
Redwing |
Flamenco |
|
|
(0 = no injury, 10 =
severe injury) |
|
|
Alternative |
1 |
1.3 |
|
Standard |
1.3 |
1.6 |
|
Untreated check |
1.5 |
2.1 |
|
LSD (0.05) |
0.3 |
ns |
|
|
|
|
|
Varietal differences |
||
|
Redwing |
1.27 |
|
|
Flamenco |
1.68 |
|
|
LSD (0.05) |
0.39 |
|
2003
![]()


2004

Figure 1. Thrips populations
with different treatments in an alternative thrips control program, Malheur
Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR.
2003
![]()


2004
a ab b
![]()


Figure 2. Average season-long
thrips populations in an alternative thrips control program, Malheur Experiment
Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR.
a
![]()

Figure
3. Predator populations in the alternative thrips trial, Malheur Experiment
Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR,
2003.
Malheur Agricultural Experiment
Station
| Malheur Experiment Station Web Site Purpose and Policy | OSU Home Page | OSU disclaimer |
Last updated Tuesday June 28, 2011.