|
YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN CORN
AND DRY BEAN CROPS
Corey V. Ransom, Charles A. Rice, and Joey K. Ishida
Malheur Experiment Station
Oregon State University
Ontario, OR, 2004
Introduction
Yellow nutsedge is an
increasing weed problem in the Treasure Valley of eastern Oregon and
southwestern Idaho. Yellow nutsedge is
particularly detrimental in onion production due to the noncompetitive nature
of the crop and the ability of yellow nutsedge to proliferate under the growing
conditions that exist in onion production.
Previous research conducted in the Treasure Valley evaluating yellow
nutsedge control in onion has met with limited success, in part due to the lack
of effective herbicide options and the weed’s ability to germinate over long
periods of time during the growing season.
An integrated approach is needed to manage yellow nutsedge, including
the use of effective herbicide treatments in each of the crops within a
rotation. In 2003, several herbicide
treatments in corn and dry bean significantly reduced the number of yellow
nutsedge tubers in the soil. This
research was conducted to further evaluate the effects of crop species and
herbicides on growth and development of yellow nutsedge in field corn and dry
bean production.
Methods
Studies were conducted
in a field heavily infested with yellow nutsedge located north of Ontario on
the Oregon Slope. The soil was a Owyhee
silt loam with pH 8.5 and 1.7 percent organic matter. The field was disked on May 19 and ground hogged on May 20. The field was bedded for corn and dry bean on May 21 and preirrigated. Plots were 7.33 ft wide and 30 ft long and
were replicated 4 times and arranged in a randomized block design. Pretreatment nutsedge tubers were sampled
May 31, which consisted of taking 8
core samples measuring 4.25 inches in diameter and 7 inches deep from the
center furrow within each individual plot.
The samples were combined and the tubers were extracted from the soil by
washing the soil through screens with 11/64-inch holes. To determine treatment effects on tuber
numbers, core samples were taken again at harvest. Season-end core samples were taken from the bed tops of the
center two rows in each plot. Four cores
were sampled from each row. The extraction process for season-end yellow nutsedge
tubers was the same as for the initial samples. In total, tuber sampling involved taking 1,280 core samples and
washing tubers from approximately 3.9 tons of soil. Herbicide applications were made with a CO2-pressurized
backpack sprayer calibrated to deliver 20 gal/acre at 30 psi. Crop injury and visual evaluations of yellow
nutsedge control were made throughout the growing season. Yields were taken for each crop by harvesting
the center two rows of each plot.
Corn
Beds were sidedressed
with 150 lbs of nitrogen (N) on May 31.
The field was harrowed on June 1 and preplant incorporated (PPI) Dual ll
Magnum®
(s-metolachlor) treatments were applied to plots and incorporated by making two
passes with the bed harrow in opposite directions. Pioneer ‘P-36N69
Roundup Ready’ field corn was planted on June 1 on a 7-inch seed spacing on
22-inch rows. Mid-postemergence treatments were applied June 21 and late
postemergence treatments were applied on June
29. Postemergence treatments included
Basagran® (bentazon),
Permit®
(halosulfuron), and Roundup® (glyphosate).
Basagran and Roundup were applied once following PPI Dual Magnum, twice
alone, or twice following PPI Dual Magnum.
Permit was applied once alone and in combination with Basagran following
PPI Dual Magnum. Basagran and Permit
were applied in combination with a crop oil concentrate (COC) while ammonium
sulfate (AMS) was added to Roundup applications. Yield was determined by harvesting ears from the center two rows
of each plot on October 12. The ears
were shelled, and grain moisture content and weights were recorded. Final yields were adjusted to 12 percent
moisture content.
Dry Bean
On May 31, plots were
sidedressed with 150 lb N/acre. On June
1, beds were harrowed, and PPI herbicide treatments were applied and
incorporated by harrowing the beds twice more in opposite directions. PPI treatments included Dual Magnum® (s-metolachlor), Eptam® (EPTC), and a combination of Dual Magnum plus Eptam. Small white beans (‘Aurora’ variety) were planted
and Prowl®
(pendimethalin) was applied preemergence to help control weeds other than
yellow nutsedge. On June 11, due to poor bean emergence, we decided to
replant. The field was sprayed with
0.75 lb ai/acre Roundup and 2.5 lb/acre of AMS to remove the beans that had
emerged. A different variety of pinto
bean ‘Othello’ was planted on June 14.
Postemergence treatments were applied July 6 and included Sandea® (halosulfuron) plus nonionic surfactant (NIS) and Basagran
plus COC. The plots treated with Basagran
received a second application of Basagran on July 21. On September 16, plants were pulled from the center two rows of
each plot to determine dry bean yield.
After the bean plants had dried, the beans were threshed by with a Hege
plot combine.
Results and Discussion
Corn
The corn rotation had
some of the best yellow nutsedge control and all treatments had less tuber
production compared to the untreated check (Table 1). Corn was not injured by any of the herbicide treatments evaluated. Yellow nutsedge control ranged from 68 to 97
percent on July 8 and 79 to 97 percent on July 28 (Table 1). Dual II Magnum alone and Roundup applied
twice provided the least control on July 8 and Dual II Magnum provided less control
than all other treatments on July 28.
Treatments with herbicides applied PPI and followed by multiple
postemergence (POST) applications tended to have greater yellow nutsedge
control than treatments with only PPI or POST treatments. Tuber numbers increased by 55 percent in the
untreated plots. In herbicide-treated
plots the change in yellow nutsedge tuber numbers ranged from a 68 percent
decrease to a 2 percent increase. Dual
II Magnum followed by Permit plus COC resulted in significantly fewer tubers
than Dual II Magnum followed by one application of Basagran plus COC. Corn yields did not differ significantly
among treatments and ranged from 224 to 246 bu/acre.
Dry Bean
Dry beans also appear
to have effective options for yellow nutsedge control. On the July 8 evaluation, yellow nutsedge
control was significantly better with Eptam plus Dual Magnum when both were
applied PPI as compared to Eptam applied PPI and Dual Magnum applied
preemergence (PRE) (Table 2). On July
8, treatments with Dual Magnum applied PPI were more effective than Eptam PPI
followed by Dual Magnum PRE. At this
rating, POST treatments had been applied only 2 days earlier and yellow
nutsedge was not exhibiting symptoms.
On July 28, herbicide treatments provided 59-91 percent yellow nutsedge
control. Treatments with only PPI or
POST herbicides were generally less effective than combinations with a PPI
application followed by one or two POST herbicide applications. Yellow nutsedge tuber numbers increased by
77 percent in the untreated plot. In
the herbicide-treated plots, the change in yellow nutsedge tuber numbers ranged
from a 43 percent decrease to a 7 percent increase with no significant
differences between herbicide treatments.
All herbicide treatments increased dry bean yield compared to the
untreated check. Basagran applied twice
POST had lower bean yield than Eptam plus Dual Magnum applied PPI.
Table 1. Corn yield, yellow nutsedge control, and yellow nutsedge tuber response
to herbicide treatments, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University,
Ontario, OR, 2004.
|
|
|
|
Crop yield |
Nutsedge control |
|
Average nutsedge tubers |
|||
|
Treatmenta |
Rate |
Timingb |
7-8 |
7-28 |
|
Initial |
Final |
Change |
|
|
|
lb ai/acre %v/v |
|
bu/acre |
-------------%----------- |
|
----------no/ft2--------- |
---%--- |
||
|
Untreated
control |
-- |
-- |
224 |
-- |
-- |
|
148 |
220 |
55 |
|
Dual II
Magnum |
1.6 |
PPI |
243 |
68 |
79 |
|
164 |
77 |
-32 |
|
Basagran +
COC Basagran +
COC |
1.0 + 1.0 % 1.0 + 1.0% |
MP LP |
240 |
94 |
86 |
|
172 |
62 |
-57 |
|
Roundup +
AMS Roundup +
AMS |
0.58 + 2.5 0.58 + 2.5 |
MP LP |
235 |
69 |
88 |
|
193 |
75 |
-54 |
|
Dual II
Magnum Basagran +
COC |
1.6 1.0 + 1.0% |
PPI LP |
236 |
84 |
89 |
|
123 |
78 |
2 |
|
Dual II
Magnum Roundup +
AMS |
1.6 0.58 + 2.5 |
PPI MP |
246 |
79 |
87 |
|
154 |
72 |
-49 |
|
Dual II
Magnum Permit + COC |
1.6 0.031 + 1.0% |
PPI MP |
231 |
83 |
95 |
|
238 |
64 |
-68 |
|
Dual II
Magnum Basagran
+ Permit + COC |
1.6 1.0 + 0.031 + 1.0% |
PPI MP |
229 |
97 |
97 |
|
260 |
69 |
-67 |
|
Dual II
Magnum Roundup +
AMS Roundup +
AMS |
1.6 0.58 + 2.5 0.58 + 2.5 |
PPI MP LP |
245 |
83 |
92 |
|
248 |
89 |
-53 |
|
Dual II
Magnum Basagran +
COC Basagran +
COC |
1.6 1.0 + 1.0% 1.0 + 1.0% |
PPI MP LP |
242 |
96 |
97 |
|
199 |
73 |
-58 |
|
LSD
(0.05) |
-- |
-- |
NS |
10 |
6 |
|
NS |
33 |
59 |
aCOC = crop oil concentrate, AMS = ammonium sulfate.
bApplication
timing abbreviations and dates: Preplant
incorporated (PPI) on June 1,
mid-postemergence (MP) on June 21, and late postemergence (LP) on June
29.
Table 2. Dry bean yield, yellow nutsedge control, and yellow nutsedge tuber
response to herbicide treatments, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State
University, Ontario, OR, 2004.
|
|
|
|
Crop yield |
Nutsedge control |
|
Average nutsedge tubers |
|||
|
Treatmenta |
Rate |
Timingb |
7/8 |
7/28 |
|
Initial |
Final |
Change |
|
|
|
lb ai/acre %v/v |
|
cwt/acre |
-----------%----------- |
|
-----------no/ft2---------- |
---%--- |
||
|
Untreated control |
|
|
33 |
-- |
-- |
|
236 |
365 |
77 |
|
Dual Magnum |
1.6 |
PPI |
41 |
76 |
59 |
|
198 |
149 |
3 |
|
Eptam Dual Magnum |
3.9 1.6 |
PPI PRE |
42 |
40 |
68 |
|
352 |
231 |
-14 |
|
Eptam Dual Magnum |
3.9 1.3 |
PPI |
45 |
78 |
76 |
|
218 |
141 |
-28 |
|
Dual
Magnum Sandea +
NIS |
1.6 .031+.25% |
PPI POST |
44 |
81 |
91 |
|
235 |
172 |
7 |
|
Dual
Magnum Sandea + Basagran +
NIS |
1.6 .031+ 1.0+.25% |
PPI POST POST |
43 |
73 |
91 |
|
271 |
128 |
-43 |
|
Basagran +
COC Basagran +
COC |
1.0+1.0% 1.0+1.0% |
POST LP |
40 |
4 |
70 |
|
255 |
177 |
-24 |
|
Dual
Magnum Basagran +
COC |
1.6 1.0+1.0% |
PPI POST |
43 |
75 |
85 |
|
206 |
155 |
-12 |
|
Dual
Magnum Basagran +
COC Basagran +
COC |
1.6 1.0+1.0% 1.0+1.0% |
PPI POST LP |
42 |
75 |
90 |
|
279 |
158 |
-20 |
|
LSD
(0.05) |
|
|
4 |
20 |
10 |
|
156 |
75 |
65 |
aThe entire trial was treated with Prowl (1.0 lb ai/acre)
preemergence for control of weeds other than yellow nutsedge. NIS = non-ionic surfactant, COC = crop oil
concentrate.
bApplication
timing abbreviations and dates: Preplant
incorporated (PPI) on June 1, preemergence (PRE), postemergence (POST) on July 6, and late
postemergence (LP) on July 21.
Malheur Agricultural Experiment
Station
| Malheur Experiment Station Web Site Purpose and Policy | OSU Home Page | OSU disclaimer |
Last updated Tuesday June 28, 2011.