|
A Three-Year Study on Varietal
Response to an Alternative Approach for Controlling Onion Thrips (Thrips tabaci) in Spanish Onions
Lynn Jensen
Malheur County Extension
Service
Clinton C. Shock and Lamont
D. Saunders
Malheur Experiment Station
Oregon State University
Ontario, OR
Introduction
Onion (Allium cepa L.) is a major economic crop in the Treasure Valley of
eastern Oregon and western Idaho. Annually about 20,000 acres of onion are
grown in the valley. Typically, Spanish hybrids are grown for their large size,
high yield, and mild flavor.
The principal onion pest in
this region is onion thrips (Thrips
tabaci, Lindeman). Thrips cause yield reduction by feeding on the epidermal
cells of the plant. Onion thrips can reduce total yields from 4 to 27 percent,
depending on the onion variety, but can reduce yields of the largest sized
bulbs from 27 to 73 percent. The larger sized colossal and supercolossal bulbs (greater
than 4 inches and 4.25 inches, respectively) are difficult to grow and demand a
premium in the marketplace. Growers typically spray three to six times per
season to control onion thrips. Treatments include the use of synthetic
pyrethroid, organophosphate, and carbamate insecticides. The ability of these
products to control thrips has decreased from over 90 percent control in 1995
to less than 40 percent control in 2005. Onion growers are applying
insecticides more frequently in order to keep thrips populations low.
New biological insecticides
with low toxicity to beneficial predators have been developed, including neem
tree (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.)
extracts (azadirachtin) and bacterial fermentation products (spinosad). Both of
these materials have previously been evaluated for thrips control and have
performed poorly compared to conventional insecticides. However, studies during
the past 3 years have shown that season-long- applications of spinosad and
azadirachtin are superior to conventional insecticide programs for controlling
onion thrips.
Materials and Methods
A 1.5-acre field was planted
to the onion varieties ‘Vacquero’ (Nunhems, Parma, ID) and ‘Redwing’ (Bejo
Seeds, Oceano, CA) in a split-plot design on March 14, 2003, March 23, 2004,
and March 21, 2005. Vaquero is a yellow variety and Redwing is a red variety. Red varieties are generally assumed to be
more attractive to thrips than yellow varieties. The onion varieties were
planted as two double rows on a 44-inch bed. The double rows were spaced 2
inches apart. The seeding rate was 137,000 seeds/acre. Lorsban 15G®
was applied in a 6-inch band over each row at planting at a rate of 3.7 oz/1,000
ft of row for onion maggot control. Water was applied by furrow irrigation. The
field was divided into plots 37 ft wide by 100 ft long. There were three
treatments with six replications.
The three treatments were a
grower standard treatment, an untreated check, and the alternative treatment.
The grower standard treatment included Warrior® (lambda-cyhalothrin),
MSR® (oxydemeton-methyl), and Lannate® (methomyl). The
untreated check did not receive any treatments for thrips control. The
alternative treatment included Success® (spinosad) and Aza-Direct®
(azadirachtin).
Insecticide treatments were
applied 7-10 days apart during the growing season (Table 1). All insecticides
were sprayed in water at 31 gal/acre in 2003 and 39 gal/acre in 2004 and 2005. Thrips populations were sampled by two
methods. The first was by visually counting the number of thrips on 20 plants.
The second method was by cutting 10 plants at ground level and inserting the
plants into a Berlese funnel. Turpentine used in the Berlese funnel dislodged
the thrips from the plant, into a jar containing 90 percent isopropyl alcohol.
The collected thrips and predators were then counted through a binocular
microscope. Thrips populations were monitored weekly through the growing
season.
The predator populations
were monitored using pitfall traps that contained ethylene glycol. They were
evaluated three times per week. The Berlese funnel was also used to monitor
predators foraging on the plants. The onions were harvested in September and
graded in October of each year.
Results and Discussion
Weekly thrips populations
are compared in Figure 1. The alternative program had a significantly lower
average thrips population than the untreated check in all years (Fig. 2). Visual
damage to the foliage was observed with the variety Vaquero in 2004 and 2005 but
not in 2003. The visual thrips damage to Redwing was greater than for Vaquero.
There were no yield
differences between any of the treatments with Vaquero in 2003 but the
alternative treatment had significantly more colossal- and supercolossal-sized
bulbs in 2004. In 2005 the alternative
program produced significantly fewer mediums and higher total yield than the
untreated check. The alternative
program gave significantly higher colossal and supercolossal yield compared to
the untreated check (Table 2).
Redwing had significantly
more colossal-sized bulbs with the alternative treatment all years compared to both
the standard or untreated check and a significantly higher total yield in 2003
compared to the untreated check. In
2005 the alternative program had significantly higher yields than either the
standard treatment or the untreated check (Table 3).
Predator populations (Fig. 3)
were significantly higher in the alternative and untreated check treatments
than in the standard treatment. The predator population consisted mostly of
spiders, big-eyed bugs, minute pirate bugs, damsel bugs, lacewings and lady
bird beetles.
The 2004 and 2005 seasons
produced an epidemic of iris yellow spot virus (IYSV) in the trial area and
surrounding fields. The IYSV is a new disease currently spreading to most
production areas of the United States and the world. Onion thrips is the
vector, so this trial gave the opportunity to evaluate the alternative program
for IYSV control (Table 5). The onions grown under the alternative treatment
were healthier and had significantly fewer viruses than those under the
standard insecticide treatment or the untreated check.
Red onions often exhibit
thrips scarring when placed in storage due to continued feeding by the insects.
The alternative treatment produced significantly fewer damaged bulbs after
storage compared to the untreated check for the Redwing variety.
Conclusion
The alternative treatments
were equal to or in some cases significantly better than the standard
insecticide program. There was a general trend towards higher yields in the
larger bulb classes, which give a higher return to the grower. The alternative
program gave better thrips control, reduced foliage damage and increased
beneficial insect populations, perhaps by allowing the beneficials to forage on
thrips. The alternative program
produced less thrips damage to red onions in storage and reduced the incidence
of iris yellow spot virus.
References
Jensen, L., B. Simko, C.
Shock, and L. Saunders. 2003a. Alternative methods for controlling thrips.
British Crop Protection Council: Crop Science and Technology 2003 Congress
Proceedings. 2:895-900.
Jensen, L., B. Simko, C.
Shock, and L. Saunders. 2002. Alternative methods for controlling onion thrips
(Thrips tabaci) in Spanish onions. Pages
65-72 in Proceedings of the 2002
Allium Research National Conference.
Jensen, L., B. Simko, C. Shock,
and L. Saunders. 2003b. Alternative methods for controlling onion thrips (Thrips tabaci) in Spanish onions. Proceedings
of the 2003 Idaho-Malheur County Onion Growers Annual Meeting. 7pp.
Jensen, L., C. Shock, B.
Simko, and L. Saunders. 2003c. Straw mulch and insecticide to control onion
thrips (Thrips tabaci) in dry bulb
onions. Pages 19-30 in Proceedings of
the Pacific Northwest Vegetable Association Seventeenth Annual Meeting.
Table 1. Application dates of insecticide treatments
for thrips control in onions, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State
University, Ontario, OR, 2003-2005.
|
2003 Application
date Treatment* |
2004 Application
date Treatment |
2005 Application
date Treatment |
|||
|
June 7 |
A, D |
June 6 |
B, D |
June 7 |
A, D |
|
June 14 |
D |
June 16 |
B, D |
June 15 |
B, D |
|
June 25 |
C |
June 23 |
C, D |
June 22 |
C, D |
|
July 3 |
D |
July 1 |
C, D |
June 29 |
B, D |
|
July 7 |
B |
July 8 |
B, D |
July 8 |
C, D |
|
July 11 |
D |
July 19 |
C, D |
July 22 |
B, D |
|
July 25 |
C |
July 29 |
C, D |
August 1 |
C, D |
|
July 29 |
D |
|
|
|
|
*Treatments Rate
Amount/acre
A: Warrior 3.84 oz
B: Warrior 3.84 oz
MSR 2.0 pt
C: Warrior 3.84 oz
Lannate 3.0 pt
D: Success 10.0 oz
Aza-Direct 20.0 oz
|
Table 2. Yield and grade of Vacquero onion with
different strategies for controlling onion |
|||||||||
|
thrips, Malheur Experiment
Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2003-2005. |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment |
Medium |
Jumbo |
Colossal |
Super- colossal |
|
Total yield |
|
||
|
|
|
----------------------------------------cwt/acre--------------------------------------------- |
|
||||||
|
Untreated check |
9.7 |
459.7 |
464.1 |
124.0 |
|
1057.5 |
|
||
|
Standard* |
9.8 |
451.0 |
489.6 |
140.9 |
|
1091.3 |
|
||
|
Alternative† |
10.9 |
446.1 |
484.2 |
145.2 |
|
1086.4 |
|
||
|
LSD(0.05)‡ |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
|
ns |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment |
Medium |
Jumbo |
Colossal |
Super colossal |
|
Total yield |
||
|
|
|
----------------------------------------cwt/acre--------------------------------------------- |
||||||
|
Untreated check |
17.6 |
586.1 |
254.5 |
29.8 |
|
888.0 |
||
|
Standard |
11.9 |
511.3 |
306.9 |
52.3 |
|
882.4 |
||
|
Alternative |
14.8 |
409.3 |
377.4 |
126.9 |
|
928.4 |
||
|
LSD(0.05) |
ns |
ns |
76.9 |
71.9 |
|
ns |
||
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment |
Medium |
Jumbo |
Colossal |
Super colossal |
|
Total yield |
||
|
|
|
----------------------------------------cwt/acre--------------------------------------------- |
||||||
|
Untreated check |
62.8 |
557.2 |
12.1 |
0.7 |
|
632.8 |
||
|
Standard |
45.4 |
691.2 |
75.0 |
1.9 |
|
813.5 |
||
|
Alternative |
43.2 |
641.9 |
130.8 |
1.3 |
|
817.2 |
||
|
LSD(0.05) |
16.7 |
90.2 |
73.4 |
ns |
|
96.0 |
||
*The grower standard treatment included Warrior, MSR, and
Lannate.
†The alternative treatment included Success and Asa-Direct.
‡Least significant difference at alpha = 0.05
|
Table 3. Yield and grade of Redwing onion with
different strategies for controlling onion |
|||||||||
|
thrips, Malheur Experiment
Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR. |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment |
Medium |
Jumbo |
Colossal |
Super- colossal |
|
Total yield |
|
||
|
|
|
-------------------------------------cwt/acre------------------------------------------------ |
|
||||||
|
Untreated check |
12.0 |
726.4 |
107.4 |
4.0 |
|
849.8 |
|
||
|
Standard* |
14.2 |
724.2 |
174.3 |
2.2 |
|
914.9 |
|
||
|
Alternative† |
11.6 |
701.2 |
240.2 |
6.9 |
|
959.9 |
|
||
|
LSD(0.05) |
ns |
ns |
62.2 |
ns |
|
56.3 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment |
Medium |
Jumbo |
Colossal |
Super- colossal |
|
Total yield |
||
|
|
|
-------------------------------------cwt/acre------------------------------------------------ |
||||||
|
Untreated check |
57.6 |
395.1 |
9.1 |
0 |
|
461.8 |
||
|
Standard |
50.8 |
509.0 |
15.4 |
0 |
|
575.2 |
||
|
Alternative |
52.1 |
445.6 |
36.9 |
0 |
|
534.6 |
||
|
LSD(0.05) |
ns |
ns |
16.5 |
ns |
|
ns |
||
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment |
Medium |
Jumbo |
Colossal |
Super- colossal |
|
Total yield |
||
|
|
|
-------------------------------------cwt/acre------------------------------------------------ |
||||||
|
Untreated check |
272.5 |
266.1 |
0 |
0 |
|
425.1 |
||
|
Standard |
176.0 |
447.9 |
1.4 |
0 |
|
552.0 |
||
|
Alternative |
99.4 |
565.7 |
13.6 |
0 |
|
637.2 |
||
|
LSD(0.05) |
128.5 |
100.7 |
ns |
ns |
|
70.4 |
||
*The grower standard treatment included Warrior, MSR, and
Lannate.
†The alternative treatment included Success and Asa-Direct.
Table
4. Average iris yellow spot virus (IYSV) injury among insecticide treatments, Malheur
Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2004-2005.
|
Treatment |
IYSV* 2004 |
IYSV* 2005 |
|
Untreated
check |
1.5 |
1.7 |
|
Standard |
1.7 |
3.3 |
|
Alternative |
2.2 |
3.7 |
|
LSD (0.05) |
0.4 |
0.6 |
|
*Scale: 0 = dead, 5 = healthy, no lesions. |
|
|
Table 5. Thrips injury on stored
Redwing red onion, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario,
OR, 2003.
|
Thrips injury* |
|
|
Treatment |
Redwing |
|
|
|
|
Alternative |
1 |
|
Standard |
1.3 |
|
Untreated check |
1.5 |
|
LSD (0.05) |
0.3 |
*Scale: 0 = no injury, 10 = severe injury.
![]()
2003
2004
![]()

2005
![]()

Figure 1. Thrips population response
to an alternative thrips control program on onions, Malheur Experiment Station,
Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2003.
2003
![]()


2004
ab
a


![]()
2005
Figure 2. Average season-long
thrips populations on onions in an alternative thrips control program. Columns
with the same letter are not significantly different, Malheur Experiment
Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR.
a
![]()

Figure 3. Predator populations in the alternative thrips control trial in onions, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2003.
Malheur Agricultural Experiment
Station
| Malheur Experiment Station Web Site Purpose and Policy | OSU Home Page | OSU disclaimer |
Last updated Tuesday July 18, 2006 .