|
WEED CONTROL AND CROP RESPONSE WITH OPTION® AND IMPACT®
HERBICIDES IN FURROW-IRRIGATED FIELD CORN
Corey V. Ransom and Joey K. Ishida
Malheur Experiment Station
Introduction
Weed control is
important in field corn production to reduce competition with the crop and to
prevent the production of weed seed for future crops. Field trials were conducted to evaluate
Option® (foramsulfuron) herbicide applied with various adjuvants and to evaluate
Impact® (topramezone) in various combinations with other herbicides for
weed control and crop tolerance in furrow-irrigated field corn. Option is a new
postemergence sulfonylurea herbicide that controls annual and perennial grass
and broadleaf weeds in field corn.
Option contains a safener that is intended to enhance the ability of
corn to recover from any yellowing or stunting sometimes associated with the
application of sulfonylurea herbicides.
Impact is also a new herbicide registered for use in corn that provides
control of many broadleaf and grass weed species. Impact is a pigment synthesis inhibitor and
causes bleaching of treated weeds.
Materials and Methods
Two trials were
established to evaluate Option and Impact for weed control efficacy and crop
safety in furrow-irrigated field corn. Croplan
441 field corn was planted with a John Deere model 71 Flexi Planter on May 24. Seed spacing was one seed every 7 inches. Plots were sidedressed with 158 lb nitrogen
(N), 85 lb phosphorous, 6 lb sulfates, 6 lb zinc, 1 lb boron, 5 lb manganese,
and 100 lb elemental sulfur/acre on April 26. Plots were 7.33 by 30 ft and
herbicide treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block with four
replicates. Herbicide treatments were
applied with a CO2-pressurized backpack sprayer. The sprayer was calibrated to deliver 10
gal/acre at 30 psi for the Option trial and 20 gal/acre at 30 psi for the
Impact trial. Crop response and weed
control were evaluated throughout the growing season. Corn yields were determined by harvesting
ears from 26-ft sections of the center 2 rows in each 4-row plot on November 11. The harvested ears were shelled and grain
weight and percent moisture content were recorded. Grain yields were adjusted to 12 percent
moisture content. Data were analyzed
using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and treatment means were separated using
Fisher’s protected least significant difference (LSD) at the 5 percent level (P
= 0.05).
Option was evaluated
with various surfactant systems and in two combinations including Distinct®. Impact was applied in combination
with Aatrex®, crop oil concentrate (COC) and 32 percent urea ammonium
nitrate (UAN) following preemergence applications of Dual II Magnum® or Outlook®. Impact treatments
were compared to Callisto®, Option, and Clarity® treatments applied postemergence following preemergence
applications of Dual II Magnum.
Results and
Discussion
Option Combinations
Option
applied without a surfactant provided less control of pigweed species (Powell
amaranth and redroot pigweed) and barnyardgrass than the other treatments
(Table 1). Common lambsquarters was the
most difficult weed to control with Option, and Option without surfactant
provided the least control. Option with
COC for surfactant also had less common lambsquarters control than all other
treatments containing surfactant. The
addition of Distinct at either 0.088 or 0.131 lb ai/acre to Option provided
complete control of common lambsquarters.
All treatments effectively controlled hairy nightshade, although
nightshade populations were low. Kochia
control was less when Option was applied without a surfactant, but was similar
among treatments containing surfactant.
Option must be applied with a surfactant to optimize weed control. The surfactant selected can affect control of
difficult weeds such as common lambsquarters.
Corn injury was affected by surfactant, with no surfactant or COC
causing less injury than all treatments.
Corn height was also reduced by all Option treatments except for those
with COC or no surfactant. Corn yields
were not different among treatments including the untreated control (Table 2).
Impact Combinations
Dual
II Magnum alone preemergence provided less control of pigweed species, common
lambsquarters, hairy nightshade, and kochia than treatments containing a
preemergence herbicide followed by postemergence treatments (Table 3). Weed control was greater than 95 percent with
preemergence and postemergence combinations and there were no differences among
these treatments. Option postemergence
caused significantly greater injury than all other treatments on June 28 (Table
4). Clarity also caused slightly higher
injury than the other treatments. On
July 5, injury was similar among preemergence and postemergence
combinations. Corn height was reduced on
June 28 by the Option treatment compared to all other treatments. Clarity reduced corn height compared to the
untreated control, but height was similar to all other treatments except
Option. On July 5 there were no
differences in corn height among treatments.
Corn yields were not different among treatments including the untreated
control.
Table 1. Weed control with Option® herbicide applied with different
surfactants and with Distinct®
in field corn, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario,
OR, 2005.
|
|
|
|
Weed control‡ |
||||||||
|
Treatment |
Rate* |
Timing† |
Pigweed spp§ |
|
C. lambs- quarters |
|
H. night- shade |
|
Kochia |
|
Barnyard- grass |
|
|
lb ai/acre pt/acre % v/v |
|
------------------------------------- % -------------------------------------- |
||||||||
|
Untreated |
-- |
-- |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Option + MSO + 32% N |
0.066 + 1.0 + 3.0 |
MP |
99 a |
|
96 ab |
|
100 |
|
100 a |
|
100 a |
|
Option + MSO + 32% N |
0.066 + 1.5 + 3.0 |
MP |
99 a |
|
99 ab |
|
100 |
|
100 a |
|
100 a |
|
Option + COC + 32% N |
0.066 + 1.0% + 3.0 |
MP |
100 a |
|
84 c |
|
100 |
|
99 a |
|
96 ab |
|
Option + MSO + AMS |
0.066 + 1.5 + 3.0 lb |
MP |
99 a |
|
97 ab |
|
100 |
|
100 a |
|
98 a |
|
Option + 32% N |
0.066 + 3.0 |
MP |
96 b |
|
72 d |
|
100 |
|
86 b |
|
89 b |
|
Option + Distinct + MSO + UAN 32% |
0.066
+ 0.088 + 1.5 + 3.0 |
MP |
100 a |
|
100 a |
|
100 |
|
100 a |
|
99 a |
|
Option + Distinct + MSO + UAN 32% |
0.066
+ 0.131+ 1.5 + 3.0 |
MP |
100 a |
|
100 a |
|
100 |
|
100 a |
|
100 a |
*Herbicide
rates are in lb ai/acre. Additive rates
are in pt/acre, percent v/v, or lb/acre.
†Treatments were applied mid-postemergence
(MP) to corn at the V4 growth stage on June 20.
‡Weed control was evaluated July
18. The untreated control was not
included in the ANOVA for weed control.
ANOVA was performed on arcsine square-root tranformed data. Non-transformed means are shown. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly
different from each other at the P = 0.05 confidence level.
§Pigweed species were a mixture of Powell amaranth and redroot
pigweed.
Table 2. Injury, height, and yield with Option® herbicide applied with different
additives in field corn, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University,
Ontario, OR, 2005.
|
|
|
|
Field corn |
||||||
|
|
|
|
Injury‡ |
|
|
Height |
Yield§ |
||
|
Treatment |
Rate* |
Timing† |
6-28 |
7-5 |
|
|
6-28 |
7-5 |
|
|
|
lb ai/acre pt/acre % v/v |
|
-------------- %------------ |
|
|
-------in------- |
bu/acre |
||
|
Untreated |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|
|
18.5 |
30.9 |
253 |
|
Option + MSO + 32% N |
0.066 + 1.0 + 3.0 |
MP |
29 |
14 |
|
|
15.2 |
30.8 |
253 |
|
Option + MSO + 32% N |
0.066 + 1.5 + 3.0 |
MP |
32 |
17 |
|
|
16.0 |
31.3 |
259 |
|
Option + COC + 32% N |
0.066 + 1.0% + 3.0 |
MP |
3 |
0 |
|
|
19.9 |
32.9 |
262 |
|
Option + MSO + AMS |
0.066 + 1.5 + 3.0 lb |
MP |
27 |
9 |
|
|
15.5 |
30.9 |
257 |
|
Option + 32% N |
0.066 + 3.0 |
MP |
4 |
3 |
|
|
19.7 |
31.6 |
268 |
|
Option + Distinct + MSO + UAN 32% |
0.066
+ 0.088 + 1.5 + 3.0 |
MP |
31 |
15 |
|
|
16.1 |
31.7 |
265 |
|
Option + Distinct + MSO + UAN 32% |
0.066
+ 0.131+ 1.5 + 3.0 |
MP |
36 |
14 |
|
|
15.8 |
30.8 |
267 |
|
LSD (0.05) |
|
|
10 |
9 |
|
|
1.4 |
NS |
NS |
*Herbicide rates are in lb ai/acre. Additive rates are in pt/acre, percent v/v,
or lb/acre.
†Treatments were
applied mid-postemergence (MP) to corn at the V4 growth stage on June 20.
‡The
untreated control was not included in the ANOVA for percent injury.
§Corn was harvested November 11 and
yields were adjusted to 12 percent moisture content.
Table 3. Weed control with Impact® herbicide in combinations with other
herbicides applied in field corn, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State
University, Ontario, OR, 2005.
|
|
|
|
Weed control‡ |
||||||||
|
Treatment |
Rate* |
Timing† |
Pigweed spp§ |
|
C. lambs- quarters |
|
H. night- shade |
|
Kochia |
|
Barnyard- grass |
|
|
lb ai/acre % v/v |
|
------------------------------------- % -------------------------------------- |
||||||||
|
Untreated |
-- |
-- |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
Dual II Magnum |
1.43 |
PRE |
86 |
|
79 |
|
79 |
|
63 |
|
96 |
|
Dual II Magnum fb Impact + AAtrex + MSO + 32% N |
1.43 0.016 + 0.5 + 1.0% + 2.5% |
PRE MP |
100 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
Dual II Magnum fb Callisto + AAtrex + COC + 32% N |
1.43 0.094 + 0.25 + 1.0% + 2.5% |
PRE MP |
100 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
97 |
|
Dual II Magnum fb Clarity + |
1.43 0.25 + 1.0% + 2.5% |
PRE MP |
100 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
96 |
|
Dual II Magnum fb Option + MSO + 32% N |
1.43 0.066 + 1.0% + 2.5% |
PRE MP |
100 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
Outlook fb Impact + AAtrex + MSO + 32% N |
0.75 0.016 + 0.5 + 1.0% + 2.5% |
PRE MP |
100 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
LSD (0.05) |
|
|
8 |
|
11 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
NS |
*Herbicide
rates are in lb ai/acre. Additive rates
are in percent v/v.
†Application
timings were preemergence (PRE) on May 26 and mid-postemergence (MP) applied to
corn at the V4 growth stage on June 18.
‡Weed control was evaluated July
18. The untreated control was not
included in the ANOVA for weed control.
§Pigweed species were a mixture of Powell amaranth and redroot
pigweed.
Table 4. Injury, height, and yield with Impact® herbicide applied in field corn,
Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2005.
|
|
|
|
Field corn |
||||||
|
|
|
|
Injury‡ |
|
|
Height |
Yield§ |
||
|
Treatment |
Rate* |
Timing† |
6-24 |
7-5 |
|
|
6-28 |
7-5 |
|
|
|
lb ai/acre % v/v |
|
------------ % --------- |
|
|
-------in------- |
bu/acre |
||
|
Untreated |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|
|
25.4 |
41.7 |
238 |
|
Dual II Magnum |
1.43 |
PRE |
0 |
0 |
|
|
24.8 |
41.9 |
246 |
|
Dual II Magnum fb Impact + AAtrex + MSO + 32% N |
1.43 0.016 + 0.5 + 1.0% + 2.5% |
PRE MP |
0 |
4 |
|
|
24.1 |
42.3 |
254 |
|
Dual II Magnum fb Callisto + AAtrex + COC + 32% N |
1.43 0.094 + 0.25 + 1.0% + 2.5% |
PRE MP |
0 |
11 |
|
|
24.3 |
38.7 |
256 |
|
Dual II Magnum fb Clarity + |
1.43 0.25 + 1.0% + 2.5% |
PRE MP |
9 |
18 |
|
|
23.1 |
41.3 |
250 |
|
Dual II Magnum fb Option + MSO + 32% N |
1.43 |
34 |
21 |
|
|
21.0 |
40.0 |
250 |
|
|
0 |
8 |
|
|
24.0 |
42.4 |
246 |
|||
|
3 |
12 |
|
|
1.5 |
NS |
NS |
|||
*Herbicide rates are in lb ai/acre. Additive rates are in percent v/v.
†Application
timings were preemergence (PRE) on May 26 and mid-postemergence (MP) applied to
corn at the V4 growth stage on June 18.
‡The
untreated control was not included in the ANOVA for percent injury.
§Corn was harvested November 11 and
yields were adjusted to 12 percent moisture content.
Malheur Agricultural Experiment
Station
| Malheur Experiment Station Web Site Purpose and Policy | OSU Home Page | OSU disclaimer |
Last updated Tuesday June 28, 2011.