|
EVALUATION OF STOCKOSORB® AS A SOIL CONDITIONER
FOR POTATO PRODUCTION
Clinton C. Shock, Erik Feibert, and Lamont D. Saunders
Malheur Experiment Station
Oregon
Introduction
Potatoes are best grown
in soil with low bulk density and excellent air and water movement,
since they are sensitive to both water stress and stresses due to the
lack of soil oxygen (Shock et al.
2007). Consequently, potatoes need to be grown in a narrow range
of soil moisture, complicating irrigation management. Stockosorb® (Stockhausen, Inc.,
Materials and Methods
Trials were conducted at two sites, on a grower’s
field near Weiser,
Seed of all potato varieties was hand cut into 2-oz seed pieces and treated with Tops-MZ® plus Gaucho® dust and placed in storage to suberize.
Weiser procedures:
The experimental design was a randomized complete block with two treatments as main plots and three varieties as split plots within the main plots. Main plots were replicated six times. Each main plot was 3 rows wide (1 variety per row) by 30 ft. long. The two treatments were an untreated check and Stockosorb-treated soil. The three varieties were ‘Russet Burbank’, ‘Owyhee Russet’, and ‘Premier Russet’. Potato seed pieces were planted manually on April 21 using a hand tool to dig holes at 9-inch intervals on 36-inch hills. Red potatoes were planted at the end of each plot as markers to separate the potato plots at harvest. Stockosorb 660 medium dry granular was applied manually over the row at 3 lb./acre. After planting, the beds were reformed manually with a rake. All agronomic practices were conducted by the grower.
Soil water tension was measured at seed piece depth using 12 Watermark soil moisture sensors Model 200SS connected to two dataloggers. For each datalogger, three sensors were installed in each of three varieties in an untreated check plot and the other three sensors in each of three varieties in a treated plot (6 sensors total/treatment).
Potatoes at the Weiser site were dug on September 23 with a two-row digger that laid the tubers back onto the soil in each row. All tubers from each plot were placed into burlap sacks and hauled to a barn where they were kept under tarps until grading.
The experimental design was a randomized complete block with two treatments as main plots and three varieties as split plots within the main plots. Main plots were replicated six times. Each main plot was 3 rows wide (1 variety per row) by 30 ft. long. The two treatments were an untreated check and Stockosorb treated soil. The three varieties were Russet Burbank, Owyhee Russet, and Premier Russet. Each plot was 1 row by 30 ft. long. Potato seed pieces were planted using a 2-row assist-feed planter with 9-inch seed spacing in 36-inch rows. Red potatoes were planted at the end of each plot as markers to separate the potato plots at harvest. Stockosorb 660 medium dry granular at 3 lb./acre was applied over the row during planting with a Gandy applicator installed behind the planter.
After planting, hills were re-formed over the rows with a Lilliston rolling cultivator. Prowl® H2O at 0.95 lb. ai/acre, Dual Magnum® at 1.3 lb. ai/acre, and Buccaneer® at 2.0 lb. ai/acre were applied as a tank mix for weed control on May 14. The herbicides were incorporated with sprinkler irrigation applying 0.56 inch of water. Matrix® at 0.38 oz. ai/acre was applied on May 29 through the sprinkler system. Poast® at 2.5 pt./acre was broadcast on June 4 for weed control. QuadrisOpti® at 0.1lb/acre of azoxystrobin and 1.0 lb. ai/acre of chlorothalonil was applied for preventive control of fungal diseases on June 11. Dithane at 2.0 lb./acre was applied through the sprinkler system for preventive control of fungal diseases on June 22.
Emergence started on May 22. Irrigation was applied 13 times, from June 10 to September 1, with scheduling based on a soil water tension criterion of 60 cb. Soil water tension was measured at seed piece depth using 12 Watermark soil moisture sensors Model 200SS connected to two dataloggers. For each datalogger, three sensors were installed in each of three varieties in an untreated check plot and the other three sensors in each of three varieties in a treated plot (6 sensors total/treatment). Irrigations were managed to maintain soil moisture below 60 cb. Irrigation decisions were based on the average of all 12 sensors. Crop evapotranspiration (ETc) was estimated by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation using data from an AgriMet weather station on the Malheur Experiment Station.
Fertilizer was applied based on petiole tests taken on June 26 and July 13. Fertilizer was injected into the sprinkler system during irrigation. During the season, 140 lb. nitrogen/acre, 5 lb. magnesium /acre, and 0.25 lb. zinc/acre were applied.
The vines were flailed on September 22. The potatoes in each plot were lifted with a two-row digger that laid the tubers back onto the soil in each row on September 28.
Tubers from each plot were placed into burlap sacks and hauled to a barn where they were kept under tarps until grading.
Procedures common to both sites:
Tubers were graded by market class (U.S. No. 1 and U.S. No. 2) and weight (<4 oz., 4-6 oz., 6-12 oz., and >12 oz.). Tubers were graded as U.S. No. 2 if any of the following conditions occurred: growth cracks, bottleneck shape, abnormally curved shape, or two or more knobs. A 20-tuber sample from each plot was placed into storage. The storage temperature was gradually reduced to 45°F. After 6 weeks, a 20-tuber sample from each plot was evaluated for tuber quality traits for processing. Specific gravity was measured using the weight-in-air, weight-in-water method. Ten tubers per plot were cut lengthwise and the 10 center slices were fried for 3.5 min. in 375°F soybean oil. Percent light reflectance was measured on the stem and bud ends of each slice using a Photovolt Reflectance Meter model 577 (Seradyn, Inc., Indianapolis, IN), with a green tristimulus filter, calibrated to read 0 percent light reflectance on the black standard cup and 73.6 percent light reflectance on the white porcelain standard plate.
Data from all trials were analyzed with the General
Linear Models analysis of variance procedure in NCSS (Number Cruncher
Statistical Systems,
Results and Discussion
From June 10 to September 1, 12.6 inches of
irrigation water was applied at
At
There was no significant difference in specific gravity or tuber fry color between the treatments at either site (Table 1).
References
Shock, C.C., A.B. Pereira, B.R. Hanson, and M.D. Cahn. 2007. Vegetable irrigation.
pages 535-606 in R.
Lescano and R. Sojka (ed.) Irrigation of agricultural crops. Second ed. Agron. Monogr.
30. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA,


Figure
1.
Soil water tension over time for the untreated check and Stockosorb
treated soil at
Table 1. Influence
of
Stockosorb on the tuber yield and grade of three potato varieties at
two sites. Malheur Experiment Station,
| U.S. No. 1 | Average fry color, light reflectance | |||||||||||||
| Total yield | Percent No. 1 | Total | >12 oz. | 6-12 oz. | 4-6 oz. | U.S. No. 2 | Marketable | <4 oz. | Cull | Specific gravity | ||||
| Site, soil | Variety | Treatment | ||||||||||||
| cwt/acre | % | ------------------------------------cwt/acre--------------------------------------- | g cm-3 | % | ||||||||||
| Ontario, silt loam | Russet Burbank | Check | 543.3 | 38.1 | 207.1 | 51.6 | 105.5 | 50.0 | 263.8 | 470.9 | 62.7 | 9.6 | 1.0750 | 42.1 |
| Stockosorb | 587.7 | 42.9 | 247.2 | 77.5 | 106.0 | 63.6 | 267.9 | 515.1 | 70.1 | 2.5 | 1.0745 | 41.6 | ||
| average | 565.5 | 40.5 | 227.1 | 64.5 | 105.8 | 56.8 | 265.9 | 493.0 | 66.4 | 6.1 | 1.0748 | 41.8 | ||
| Owyhee Russet | Check | 551.3 | 90.7 | 500.4 | 171.3 | 249.4 | 79.7 | 16.9 | 517.2 | 34.1 | 0.0 | 1.0998 | 55.7 | |
| Stockosorb | 561.9 | 90.4 | 508.0 | 155.7 | 267.8 | 84.5 | 11.8 | 519.8 | 42.1 | 0.0 | 1.1002 | 55.6 | ||
| average | 556.6 | 90.5 | 504.2 | 163.5 | 258.6 | 82.1 | 14.3 | 518.5 | 38.1 | 0.0 | 1.1000 | 55.7 | ||
| Premier Russet | Check | 562.5 | 89.4 | 502.9 | 215.2 | 232.2 | 55.5 | 23.8 | 526.7 | 35.7 | 0.0 | 1.0997 | 48.8 | |
| Stockosorb | 615.5 | 87.3 | 536.8 | 194.9 | 273.4 | 68.5 | 34.6 | 571.4 | 44.1 | 0.0 | 1.0986 | 47.0 | ||
| average | 589.0 | 88.3 | 519.8 | 205.1 | 252.8 | 62.0 | 29.2 | 549.1 | 39.9 | 0.0 | 1.0991 | 47.9 | ||
| Average | Check | 552.3 | 72.7 | 403.5 | 146.0 | 195.7 | 61.8 | 101.5 | 504.9 | 44.2 | 3.2 | 1.0915 | 48.9 | |
| Stockosorb | 588.4 | 73.5 | 430.7 | 142.7 | 215.7 | 72.2 | 104.8 | 535.4 | 52.1 | 0.8 | 1.0911 | 48.0 | ||
| LSD (0.05) | Treatment | 22.6 | NS | 26.5 | NS | 12.3 | NS | NS | 19.3 | 6.0 | NS | NS | NS | |
| Variety | NS | 47.2 | 43.4 | 40.5 | 34.5 | 15.0 | 35.3 | NS | 5.7 | NS | 0.0 | 1.4 | ||
| Trt X var | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
| Weiser, sand | Russet Burbank | Check | 631.4 | 59.3 | 381.5 | 123.2 | 187.9 | 70.5 | 190.2 | 571.8 | 59.3 | 6.2 | 1.0726 | 46.0 |
| Stockosorb | 557.6 | 58.9 | 333.7 | 84.6 | 168.3 | 80.8 | 160.4 | 494.1 | 62.6 | 0.0 | 1.0808 | 44.5 | ||
| average | 594.5 | 59.1 | 357.6 | 103.9 | 178.1 | 75.7 | 175.3 | 533.0 | 61.0 | 3.1 | 1.0767 | 45.2 | ||
| Owyhee Russet | Check | 582.4 | 87.5 | 511.6 | 112.0 | 284.5 | 115.1 | 10.7 | 522.3 | 59.7 | 1.2 | 1.1020 | 54.3 | |
| Stockosorb | 602.7 | 84.7 | 513.6 | 123.7 | 273.7 | 116.2 | 27.2 | 540.8 | 61.9 | 0.1 | 1.0983 | 54.2 | ||
| average | 592.6 | 86.1 | 512.6 | 117.8 | 279.1 | 115.7 | 19.0 | 531.5 | 60.8 | 0.7 | 1.1002 | 54.2 | ||
| Premier Russet | Check | 559.5 | 87.9 | 492.8 | 198.0 | 237.2 | 57.7 | 28.5 | 521.3 | 38.2 | 0.0 | 1.1002 | 47.9 | |
| Stockosorb | 502.0 | 84.1 | 425.9 | 156.7 | 201.1 | 68.1 | 33.5 | 459.4 | 42.6 | 0.8 | 1.0976 | 47.4 | ||
| average | 530.8 | 86.0 | 459.3 | 177.3 | 219.1 | 62.9 | 31.0 | 490.3 | 40.4 | 0.4 | 1.0989 | 47.6 | ||
| Average | Check | 591.1 | 78.3 | 462.0 | 144.4 | 236.5 | 81.1 | 76.5 | 538.4 | 52.4 | 0.2 | 1.0916 | 49.4 | |
| Stockosorb | 554.1 | 75.9 | 424.4 | 121.7 | 214.4 | 88.4 | 73.7 | 498.1 | 55.7 | 0.3 | 1.0922 | 48.7 | ||
| LSD (0.05) | Treatment | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Variety | NS | 5.3 | 56.3 | NS | 28.2 | 10.4 | 16.2 | NS | 9.1 | NS | 0.0109 | 1.2 | ||
| Trt X var | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | 22.9 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
Malheur Agricultural Experiment
Station
| Malheur Experiment Station Web Site Purpose and Policy | OSU Home Page | OSU disclaimer |
Last updated Tuesday July 19, 2011.
Shock, C.C., Feibert, E.B.G. and Saunders,
L.D. 2009. Evaluation of Stockosorb®
as a Soil Conditioner for Potato Production. p 145-149. In Shock C.C. (Ed.) Oregon State University Agricultural Experiment
Station, Malheur Experiment Station Annual Report 2009, Department of Crop and
Soil Science Ext/CrS 131.